Many people say that fitness is dead muscles, there is no explosive power, can not be practical, is it really the case?
Bodybuilder
I think dead muscle itself is a false proposition. There is a specialization in the art industry. The bodybuilder aims to build a big body, have a purpose, and add a scientific diet, the body fat rate is very low, so the muscles are strong and obvious!
Who says women are inferior to men?
The purpose of fighting athletes’ fitness is to increase the strength of the punches and legs and increase the lethality. In addition to practicing skills, endurance and confrontation, the most important thing is that there is a level of fighting. In addition, there is no unlimited diet, and the usual endurance training and weight loss before the game are not conducive to muscle growth.
Why are there dead muscles? In order to stimulate the muscles during training, bodybuilders pursue "slowness" in their movements.
The purpose of fighting is to bring down people, in addition to strength but also speed, fitness with equipment is to pursue "fastness" and increase muscle power.
The purpose of training is different, and the standards pursued by the movements are also different. In addition, bodybuilders have big chunks and less fat, so they look "sluggish".
I really don’t want everyone to spray bodybuilders anymore. Whether they use technology or not, their training is boring and boring. A strict diet is not something ordinary people can insist on. Their self-discipline is worthy of our respect.
.
