When I was working in the company before, I always argued about issues that seemed obvious. It turns out that what everyone sees is different from what they think. Each labeled the other. The label I gave you was stupid, and the label you gave me was self-righteous. In this way,

was working in the company before, I felt that the issue was very obvious and why we were always arguing about it. It turns out that what everyone sees is different from what they think. Each labeled the other. The label I gave you was stupid, and the label you gave me was self-righteous. In this way, when everyone discusses things together, they often look at their colleagues according to the labels they have attached, instead of trying their best to pay attention to the matter itself and how to make decisions. So, the debate continued.

When a woman's husband cheats on her, she feels that her marriage is unhappy. And she was so good and charming, so she judged that her cheating husband must be a scumbag. However, in fact they have been in love for many years. Live a happy life. It was just a few events that led to the infidelity.

What I admire most is that woman. She did not hate or deny her husband because of a single injury. But evaluate objectively. He did cheat on me, but he used to be funny and handsome. We loved each other very much and lived together for many years. He is particularly good to his father-in-law and his mother-in-law, who also like him very much. However, he did cheat.

In the impression of most people, cheating once will negate a lifetime. This is the downside of labeling.

Those who can see people as a series of events rather than as a concrete adult with control over their own behavior have a good point. It can reduce a lot of incomprehension, anger, and hatred. Rather, I think this is how this series of things happened. That's all.