Today I read a news that the hero chased a female classmate who had been two years and later hugged the beauty. But on the first anniversary of the marriage, the female classmate was found to have no child. This incident was a bolt from the blue for the newlyweds. Afterwards, the female classmate was depressed, and the man's family was already in trouble because the male classmate was the only son in the family. If he could not give birth to a child, it would be like he was ruined.
The final result is that the man's parents forced the woman to divorce by means, but the man never made a sound from beginning to end. It is said that the man’s parents also went to the woman’s house and took back 50% of the bride price!
Coincidentally, I saw a news a few days ago that a man could not withstand the pressure of his family and married a blind date partner. He thought there would be a hint of breath in the next days. But unexpectedly, less than three months after they got married, their parents urged them to have children again.
And this time, he was in a difficult situation. If he could barely obey his marriage, but if he really gave birth to a child, it would be a big problem. In his words, he is only 24 years old. Although he is already an adult, he has only been working for less than two years. Many times, he still mentally thinks he is a "child". Isn't it a big deal to let him take care of another child now?
In fact, we have all discovered two strange phenomena here: 1. In the first incident, the divorce of a man and a woman is because the woman cannot have a child; 2. In the second incident, the male owner can't withstand the pressure of his parents when he gets married;
If you want to ask what the marriage is for. It is estimated that the first reaction of people from their parents is to pass on the family line. Because in their era of blind marriage, it was already amazing to marry a woman as a wife. As for whether the woman was beautiful or whether she had feelings for each other, it was almost negligible.
And the only condition that they can pay attention to is: Can this woman give birth to a child!
Because in their philosophy, getting married is for the sake of having children, and having children is for the sake of sons. Giving a son means being able to pass on the family line. The parents have deeply imprinted this marriage theory in their minds and have lived a lifetime of marriage. Therefore, by our generation, they will naturally take out their valuable experiences from that year to help their children make decisions. The starting point is very simple: parents are for your own good!
However, when the post-80s and post-90s entered the marriage hall one after another, since it was their first marriage, they often had to listen to their parents' guidance. At this time, parents will inevitably impart their so-called successful concept of marriage to you, or even impose it on you. If you dare to resist, they will oppress you in the name of unfilial piety and make you surrender.
Actually, I am also very curious. If marriage is really for the purpose of inheriting the family line, then wouldn’t we just catch a partner on the street and get married? Why do you still have to take the so-called blind date route? What kind of jobs should you find stable jobs, houses and cars? It seems that these conditions are not much related to whether the family can be passed on, because even if the person has a stable job, no matter how stable he has a house or a car, you may deny him because he cannot give birth to a child.
What is the purpose of getting married? In my opinion, marriage is nothing more than living alone, so we need to meet someone and choose a city to live a life of old age. A brief summary is: I can’t live without it! If you are willing to enter marriage, it means that you cannot live without him in your life. He cannot live without you in his life. You are embracing each other and working through wind and rain, and it has nothing to do with whether you have children or not.
