In love, do you always give what you have with the lowest value?
In the Peacock Forest, Ruffian Cai finally told Liu Wei Ting at the beach:
From the above text, I felt a kind of helplessness. Romance should not be because of some act of giving, but the feeling of the person who feels it. a feeling. Is there still romance in the atmosphere above? It feels like I can no longer see it. What I see is more sadness, helplessness, and sadness. . . What is left of the heroine may be the last touch of emotion. . .
I was thinking today, is it true that a giver only pays for what he has the most cost-effective? The scapegoat is rich, so to him the value of money is less valuable than his time and energy. But to Ruffian Cai, because he is poor, it is his time and energy that is worthless?
I couldn't understand the kind of male protagonist who spends money on holidays to ward off disasters before, but now I understand it very well. It is such a simple and happy thing to be able to use money to make your other half happy, and let everyone be happy together. Because maybe the male protagonist has a lot of things to worry about, and his mood at this time is already difficult to control, so spending money has become the simplest operation with the lowest cost.
It is extremely difficult to find a partner who can resonate with you emotionally, but you have to do it and cherish it.
