Another point is that this time it involves the People's Education Society. The People's Education Society version has always been "a great responsibility is given to the sky." There are indeed many people who learn "this person", and in my impression is also "this person".

What is the next step behind the html that will give great responsibilities to you in 0 days? I guess no one can explain it clearly. The right or wrong of "this person" and "being a person" have no impact on the development of society. When discussing such issues, people are more about joining in the fun and regaining their past memories. Another point is that this time, the Human Education Society is involved. The People's Education Society version has always been "a great responsibility is given to the sky." There are indeed many people who learn "this person", and in my impression is also "this person".

Is the debate between "S" and "Yes" a Mandela effect? Is it just that everyone’s memories do not match the facts? This does not exist. What is certain at present is that many people have learned about "this person" and "it's human". Since the current version of the People's Education Society is "human", I believe that there are very few people who retain early textbooks, which is difficult to prove for a while.

But what I want to say here is that it is actually very simple to find out this matter. All the teaching materials of the People's Education Society should be archived, you can tell by checking it. A problem arises here. The People's Education Press insists that it has always used "humanity". If the Chinese textbooks from the last century were published, would it be slap in the face?

There is another situation that needs to be explained clearly. There were many versions of textbooks in the past. The People's Education Press said that their family has always been "human" and it is also possible. Perhaps the "people" we are learning are other versions of textbooks. It is a famous quote from Mencius . The two textbooks are different. Because the information was not developed at that time, the teacher taught the textbooks like this, and the students followed. There is now embarrassment of "this" and "yes". According to the explanation of Wen Rumin , everyone is right.

People's Education Society has a very bad reputation among the people and has basically no trust. This time, "yes" and "this" are actually the spread of emotions in the early stage. Everyone no longer has special trust in the People's Education Society and Wen Rumin. They say that Wen Rumin can be used for universal purposes, but the people do not agree with it, believing that universal is actually just defending their mistakes. At this time, the People's Education Society needs to provide strong evidence to prove its innocence.

final conclusion

The debate between "this person" and "is a person" is actually secondary. In essence, no matter which side makes sense. According to Wen Rumin and other teachers, it is common, and there are indeed records of "being a human being" in related ancient books, and everyone has evidence of this person. Why do you want to slap this question? In fact, this is a crisis of trust!

On the one hand, it is the distrust of the people in the experts. Normally, the editor-in-chief of Chinese textbooks shows up and the doubts will fade. The fact is just the opposite. There are a lot of complaints, and the people are also a little disappointed in the crisis of trust in the textbooks of the People's Education and Society. This incident reveals that both sides distrust each other. The editor-in-chief of the Chinese textbook and the People's Education Society are the issues that the People's Education Society needs to consider. The logic behind the debate between "this person" and "is human" is trust, not right or wrong!