Why is Huawei being suppressed? Obviously, it has something to do with Huawei's world leadership in 5G technology. In the era of big data, it goes without saying that communication equipment is important. Whoever can control the voice of the 5G market will become the winner in th

Why is Huawei suppressed?

Obviously, it has something to do with Huawei's world leadership in 5G technology.

In the era of big data, it goes without saying that communication equipment is important. Whoever can control the voice in the 5G market will become the winner in the new era. In the past few decades, the leader in the communications market has been the United States. Thanks to its technological and equipment advantages, American companies represented by and Qualcomm can make a lot of money every year by charging huge patent fees. More importantly, by taking advantage of the convenience of "own" devices, Americans can also master some of the information they want to master.

However, since entering the 5G era, US companies have gradually lost their say in the communications market. Domestic technology companies such as Huawei and ZTE have become leaders in the industry. Huawei, in particular, is far ahead in 5G technology and has not given any The United States has a chance. Because of this, Huawei has been slandered, suppressed, and sanctioned. Laos and the United States have also joined forces with EU countries to boycott Huawei equipment and want to completely dismantle Huawei communication equipment. Now, two or three years have passed. At what stage are plans to dismantle equipment in Europe and the United States?

When the United States was smearing Huawei's communication equipment, Ren Zhengfei was not panicked at all, and even wanted to laugh a little. The old man once publicly expressed his gratitude to the United States for providing free publicity to Huawei. Now the whole world knows that Huawei’s 5G equipment is powerful. I have to admit that this time I was really caught by Mr. Ren. Today's "demolition team" in Laos and the United States is very embarrassed. The demolition of Huawei equipment has encountered two major obstacles!

Recently, according to foreign media, the US Communications Commission publicly "acknowledged" two major difficulties in dismantling Huawei equipment:

. US operators put forward many "unsatisfiable" conditions in their applications for dismantling Huawei equipment;

. The cost of dismantling Huawei equipment in the United States is much higher than expected.

Previously, in order to encourage American operators to dismantle Huawei equipment, the United States promised to provide subsidies of US$1.9 billion. However, during the dismantling process, it was discovered that the cost of dismantling Huawei equipment would cost at least US$5.3 billion, much higher than the United States expected. If the demolition continues, Lao America will need to spend more money. However, now that Lao America has encountered a severe economic recession and is basically in a stage where it cannot protect itself, the US$3.4 billion gap cannot be filled at all. And if the demolition is not continued, the economic losses of American operators have already been caused, and Laos and the United States will also "slap" themselves in the face. Therefore, Lao and the United States are now quite embarrassed and in a dilemma.

To be honest, these six words "dismantle Huawei equipment" are easy to say, but very difficult to do. Huawei has been deeply involved in overseas operations for many years. With its ultra-high cost-effectiveness, Huawei's communication equipment is loved by many local operators and users, especially in rural areas in the United States. If it is to be completely dismantled, it is equivalent to having all the communication projects in rural areas of the United States be torn down and then rebuilt. Even if the operators agree, American users will not agree.

And Huawei’s 5G equipment is the best in the world, Nokia , Ericsson cannot compare. Huawei holds the largest number of 5G patented technologies in the world, and provides the lowest prices to operators in other countries. I wonder, is there a better choice? Huawei has great advantages in terms of work efficiency, technical advantages of equipment, and after-sales service. And if Huawei seriously starts charging patent fees, no one will be able to escape! So no matter which angle you look at it, Huawei equipment cannot be dismantled. What do you think about this? Welcome to leave comments and messages!