On October 26, the topic of "Heaven will give great responsibilities to 'is it a person' or 'this person'" became a hot search on the Internet, causing widespread discussion among netizens.
topic became a hot search, and netizens raised questions, "In our memory, the Chinese textbooks are written in the Chinese textbooks, "Heaven will give great responsibilities to this man." But in the current Chinese textbooks, "Heaven will give great responsibilities to this man."
With the response of the Ministry of Education, things seem to be getting brighter. On the 27th, the editor-in-chief of the Chinese textbooks of primary and secondary schools, and professor of the Chinese Department of Peking University, posted on Weibo that the text was selected from "Mencius Translation and Annotation" by Zhonghua Book Company , and it was not changed. It was originally "a man". Is this really the case with
? But in my impression, the Chinese textbook also says "Si Ren"
? ? ? What's going on?
Is it another memory deviation for netizens, human memory has been tampered with, and Mandela effect appears again?
tips: Mandela Effect (English name: The Mandela Effect) is a psychological effect, referring to the public's collective memory of history does not match historical facts
There are also some netizens who take advantage of the topic to link the incident with the "toxic textbook" incident, criticizing the Ministry of Education for irresponsible responses, and the People's Education Society 's response is perfunctory and unconvincing.
So, how to solve this problem? Let’s study together. What we want to clarify first is what is the difference between “being a person” and “this person”
Han dictionary website is a website that was founded in 2004 in . Many literary and philology scholars look for information from the Han dictionary. The following is the content that the editor took from the Chinese dictionary:
Yes, there are 13 definitions, 11 definitions are "this, this" commonly used as "everywhere"
In the change of word, when "yes" is used as a pronoun, it is explained as "this, this". In "Mencius: Gaozi II", "Heaven will give great responsibilities and people must first suffer their minds."
Let's take a look at "this"
At the same time, "this" is also the meaning of the pronoun "this, this". I believe that the friends who have seen this have clearly understood the editor's meaning. Whether it is "this person" or "human" must be translated as "this person". The ancient Chinese meaning is ", so God will issue a major responsibility to such people, and they must first make their hearts painful "
Therefore, the authoritative and unified textbooks we pursue are necessary, but Chinese culture is profound and profound, and is influenced by time, age, and history. Whether it is "this person" or "this person" has the same meaning. We require the Ministry of Education to ensure that children are unified and have a careful source, so that children should not lose points due to such problems during the exam.
At the same time, the editor believes that more important point is that parents can use this event to teach children dialectical thinking. Everything is moving in our world, and forbidden is relative. This is not only a philosophical theory but also a wisdom of survival. Faced with a complex world, what we need to learn is to be brave to explore and question.
When we were in elementary school, we all had this understanding. "I think what the teacher taught must be right, and what parents said must be the truth and there will be no mistakes." However, after going to college, as a literary student, more and more questions have no standard answers, but no one said anything on the road of our growth. The black or white that we always thought was broken, and it was difficult to adapt to this cognitive change that made people distressed for a long time.
Doesn’t this make it seem that our parents and teachers do not teach us thinking when educating us, but are just traditional and single teaching, not thinking.
Therefore, when we educate our children, we should be wiser and learn the educational method of "enlightenment of wisdom and wisdom". Although we must maintain a critical spirit, it is by no means blind criticism or follow-up criticism. Instead, based on one's own understanding, criticize with awe of history, and do not criticize for the sake of criticism and make unintentional disputes.
0 Let’s talk about it again, from this point of view, we can indeed clearly understand how much impact the textbooks have on students, generations, and even generations. The textbooks should be authoritative, unified, and rigorous. This will prevent poisonous textbook incidents.
So what do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area.
