There are groups of certain levels, and these two days have been arguing about "Heaven will give great responsibilities to man" and "Heaven will give great responsibilities to man". A staff member of the Chinese editorial department of the People's Education Press Middle School s

2025/06/2402:46:37 education 1995

has a certain level of group, and these two days have been arguing about "Heaven will give great responsibilities to man" and "Heaven will give great responsibilities to man".

The staff of the Chinese editorial department of the People's Education Press Middle School said that since the text "Born in distress, die in peace" was included in 1961, the textbook articles of "Since the Heaven will give great responsibilities to man", and there has never been a "Since the Heaven will give great responsibilities to man".

is just about to take pictures of each textbook and tell the world.

1961 version

is right. The title of the text was added by the editor. It can be seen from the photo above that it was originally called "Heaven will give great responsibilities and people". Many later versions are called "Born in distress, die in happiness".

Many netizens and experts have confirmed that the ancient books also say "It's a human being".

"Mencius"

"Siku Quanshu·Mencius Commentary"

As a senior Chinese language representative for six years in middle school, I will tell you responsibly that the textbooks I learned are also "so people".

Moreover, here is an important knowledge point and investigation point: you cannot be confused with "so". When breaking sentences, you cannot read "So/Man", you should read "So/Man".

reference material can help people strengthen memory or correct memory.

Sometimes when I saw "this person" on the Internet, I would wonder when I think of this knowledge point, and then I would search for it more.

Chinese text (including local versions) is very rigorous and should be "so people". Moreover, for a long time, people's education textbooks have been used. It is unlikely that middle-aged and elderly people can use local versions when they were young, right?

said it was unfounded, and my family found the 1987 version of the junior high school textbook I used. Sure enough, "so people are":

Most of the friends I discussed with me thought it was "so people".

A friend said that when he was a child, he read "Water Margin" and when he saw "this guy" he would think: What does it have to do with "this person" who "reduced great responsibilities to this person"?

Some netizens also used the lyrics of "Love Me China" to make an analogy: is it ", 56 ethnic groups, , 56 flowers" or "fifty six constellations, 56 flowers"?

What's going on?

Please note that the core of the discussion here is how to write in the junior high school Chinese textbook. Some friends have dug out some books about "Shiren", but that is not textbooks.

There is another situation. For example, in the following book, ambiguously adds "or "this person"" to compromise with the reality that is spread by mistakes . The actual reason for the controversial issue of

can be attributed to three aspects:

First, there are many occasions when "this person" appears and has accumulated popularity.

Du Fu wrote "The crown is covered with the capital, and this person is alone and haggard." Chapter Taiyan for 1911 Revolution Yuanxun Huang Xing is the elegiac couplet: "There is no justice, there will be no Republic of China, and there must be such a person in history." Contemporary people also often use the expression "this person has passed away".

Second, outside the textbook, various reading materials, film and television works, and even some input methods and search engine recommendation options have caused too much interference, and the result is that when the fake is true, it is also true.

Most people do not have such a strong sense of doubt and such solid memories. Under the influence of "this person", they are easily misled.

I heard that a famous book in the 1950s was also written as "Yu Si Ren", which influenced many people, but it was later corrected. There were also newspapers who mistakenly “corrected” “this person” as “this person.”

As for the recommendation of input method, you should know that the misuse of some words (such as "天,天,天") nowadays also has great "profits".

. Search engine prompts are often derived from the input habits of a large number of users.

hard search for "is a person". The search engine makes you think you are wrong. Ask if you want to continue:

continues, but continues, it is still . About 100 million :

"Shiren"? I found about 7.4 million results for :

You see, in terms of quantity, "is people" has an absolute advantage.

Third, memory will be biased and sometimes it will be lie.

For example, when you are in a certain scene, you will feel that you have had the same experience before. In fact, it may have happened similar situations, or it may have not happened.

I heard that there is a concept that needs to be proven in psychology, called " Mandela effect ", which means that the public's collective memory of history does not match historical facts. This comes from the news of Mandela's death in 2013. Many people around the world are asking: Didn't he die long ago?

By the way, compare the lyrics of "Love Me China".

Just look for multiple versions sung by Song Zuying, and Zhang Ye's version, all of which are "fifty-six constellations, fifty-six flowers" . The lyrics of

are written in this way, first, it is the need for concreteness, and second, it avoids literal and conceptual repetition with the next sentence "Brothers and sisters of the fifty-six clans are family".

, but there is also a chorus version that has been modified with , which is connected to "fifty-six ethnic groups, fifty-six flowers, and fifty-six brothers and sisters are a family."

Then many friends also recorded Song Zuying's version as "fifty-six ethnic groups".

Is this a bit similar to the dispute between "being a person" and "this person"?

Some friends still refused to give in after seeing the evidence of the textbook. But this matter has to be evidence, right? The People's Education Society has said that it has always been "so people". If you have any objections to this or use the local textbook "Yu Si Ren Ye", you are welcome to show evidence to let everyone see who has "mislead people's children".