The second type is nonsense, the topic shifting type!
Both sides argue about one thing and one point of view, and should make arguments about this question. But this type of people is not. For example, when we discuss the right or wrong of a point of view, he said: This point of view is wrong, because the person who brings this point of view looks ugly. Nani? Is this person's appearance related to his views?
You correct it and discuss it again, and he will say: Is this view credible? He had peed on the kang when he was a child. He drew an ugly painting last week. I saw him walking with the woman from the east of the village.
There were many people participating in the debate on the Internet. This type of contestant accounted for the majority, and soon the topic would be deviated. As for what the original argument was, I gradually couldn't find it. So much so that both sides screamed for a long time, but they didn't know why! !
Third, overconfident
Overconfident people are not suitable for participating in debates. Such people are stubborn. No matter what you say or what evidence you take, in their eyes, it is yours. It has nothing to do with him, he is just different from you.
If you ask him to come up with the corresponding argument, he will either not be able to come up with it or just insist on saying that I am here, and that's what I am like.
It is precisely because of these three types of people that once there is controversy on the Internet, it will almost always turn into invalid quarrels and scoldings. So try not to participate in this collective discussion online, it is meaningless and nothing! !
