As we all know, taking a concubine is also called filling a house, which means that a woman who is not a wife who is married as a spouse, is a product of polygamy in the old era. Since the implementation of monogamy, the system of concubines has been completely abolished, and now we can only see this kind of scene in film and television works.
Of course, we also know that abolishing the system is nothing more than a matter that can be solved by a law. Although there are no blatant "concubine" scenes in reality, things with the same substance may not happen rarely. The difference is that there is no grand wedding celebration and dependence relationships are not protected by law.
But recently, an open "concubine" incident happened in public: several people led by a woman to the entrance of a hospital in Xuzhou, Jiangsu, and then pulled open a banner to open a public "concubine" for her husband. But when I looked closely at the content on the banner, I couldn't help but laugh: "General surgeons Wang love my husband deeply. As a wife, I come to propose marriage and take a concubine!" It turned out that this was an act of the original wife humiliating the person who interfered.
Just from the text on the banner, if the party can put the real name of her husband behind "my husband", the content of this banner will be much more fulfilling, which may bring a stronger impact. Of course, if you just want to expose your anger and let this Wang lose face, it would be enough as shown in a banner.
In the overwhelming comments, most netizens were indignant and supported the original wife and condemned the female nurse. Some partners were worried that the original wife's approach would be unfavorable to them. Only some partners, like this editor, thought of the first thing that came to mind was the law: it is reasonable to denounce third parties, but this approach is not worth imitating, so don't violate the law. Secondly, when encountering such a bad thing, you must not only be calm but also be wise.
When it comes to illegal, many netizens may disagree: one is not fabricated facts, and the other is not verbal attacks. Is it a female nurse who has an affair with a woman regardless of her reputation. If you want to say that illegality is also a third party who destroys other people's marriage, is it illegal for the original wife to pull a banner?
To be fair, how much do we, as outsiders, know the truth? Is there any possibility that the parties involved have misunderstood something? Is there any possibility that the female nurse is deceived by the client’s husband? If we cannot conclude that we are just shouting out of righteous indignation and even giving advice (such as asking the person involved to expose photos of the female nurse), then are we considered the pirates who are not interested in the big deal?
Even if the parties say it is true, the female nurse deliberately intervenes with the marital status of the parties’ husband, have you ever thought that there is something in this world called "the evil person complains first"? It can be clearly stated here that if the "evil" catches the handle and complains first and the parties have no ironclad evidence, the original wife is really likely to be illegal. There is a case as evidence:
From July 4th to 24th, 2021, Ms. Zhou from Kunming used her husband's mobile phone Huawei account to log in to Huang's Huawei account many times and checked Huang's photos backed up in the cloud. It turned out that her husband had a private relationship with Huang. Then someone made a large number of posters and 3 banners (the content was "Huang, No. 501, Unit 20, Building 20, a certain garden. He loved my husband very much and made him clear. As a wife, he came to take a concubine ", "Thanks to Ms. Huang, No. 501, Unit 20, a certain garden for providing X services to my husband for free"), and posted them in various corners of the community where Huang lives.
After get off work, Huang saw the aforementioned poster and banner immediately took a photo and kept it. He then called the police and sued Ms. Zhou on the grounds of reputation infringement. Ms. Zhou, who was wise during the trial, did not appear in court. After the trial, she submitted a written defense containing evidence of her husband's affair with Huang, and denied that the posters and banners were her actions.
The subsequent trial party found out that Huang and Ms. Zhou’s husband did violate public order and good customs, and the existing evidence cannot confirm that the posters and banners were done by Ms. Zhou. Even if they did it, it was caused by Huang’s prior behavior. Although it was inappropriate, it was understandable.Because the photos provided by Huang cannot determine the location of posters and banners, the damage consequences that caused the plaintiff's social evaluation to be reduced were not confirmed. At the same time, the trial party believed that the fact that Huang divorced her husband was also caused by his own behavior, so he rejected all Huang's lawsuit requests.
From the above simple case, we can see that the content of the banner involved is exactly the same as the content of the aforementioned banner. The key to the loss of the "bad person" who complained first is that Ms. Zhou holds the key evidence that Huang intervened in her marriage. Therefore, we say that if the parties involved do not have ironclad evidence, they may be considered illegal.
Of course, this kind of banner-pulling is much calmer than siege and fighting in the street, but it is still not wise. A wise approach is simple. First, be wise, temporarily tolerate, leave a clear path for him and a way out for himself. The second is rationality, collect all the bad evidence that can prove his cheating in marriage, and if he is obsessed with it, he will ask for compensation for damages during divorce. Our country's laws clearly stipulate that if one party engages in illegal cohabitation with others, the other party, as the party at no fault, can request compensation for damages. How much can I pay for it? It is related to his harshness.
When it comes to this, there will definitely be a female partner who can't bear it. Is this too sinister? We say this is not insidious but retribution. He can hide the truth. Why can't you secretly cross Chen Cang? He can put you in dire straits, why can't you give him a pot to remove the firewood? But we really don't want anyone to get to this point.
Back to the point, many partners have psychological misunderstandings about marriage relationships. Once there is a gap between the two, the word "breaking mirror" is difficult to round. In fact, marriage is just a process of putting two pieces of raw materials into a mirror. There is only the length and shortness of the running-in time. As long as you insist on grinding, there is no mirror that cannot be rounded.
As for cheating in marriage, of course part of it is a matter of nature, but there is a fact that everyone has to admit: no husband can get used to a arrogant wife, and no wife can stand the petty husband. Therefore, some of the cheating in marriage must be a mistake in one slap and both.
