When I was typing this paragraph, the input method was prompted by itself. The input method was based on "this person". Many people remember that it was also "this person", but the textbook of the People's Education Press is "this person", so both sides fought for many rounds. The hot topic of
is actually quite boring. I heard a blogger of classical literature discuss this topic a few months ago, but it is limited to the circle of classical literature. Unexpectedly, after a few months, it broke the circle.
let the public discuss a literary issue, and it feels like fennel bean has several ways of writing.
In fact, whether it is "s" or "yes" means "this". Any word makes sense. Before the emergence of printing, ancient classics were basically spread by copying, which inevitably leads to mis-copying.
plus any word can be explained, so both ways of writing are harmless. The People's Education Press version may not be the standard answer, but what exactly did Mencius write? This may not be that important.
For example, Li Bai's 's will be added to the wine . There is a sentence in "I was born to be useful, and I will come back after all the money is gone." When I read this sentence, I also had some questions in my mind, because this is an ancient style poem. When changing the rhymes of ancient style poems, the first and second sentences should generally rhyme, so that they can reflect the smoothness of being completed in one go.
We open the poem "Wine in the wine" and changed the rhyme several times. Only these two sentences " is born to be useful, and I will come back to after all." There is no rhyme. Although this poem is very good, it does not conform to Li Bai's writing habits at that time.
Until later someone found a handwritten copy of the Tang people in Dunhuang documents, which read " was born with talent, but I will come back to after all my money was gone." This may be the original appearance of Li Bai's wine. The version we see now may be the version modified by later generations based on their own ideas. Although
has been modified, this does not affect the textbook still printed as "I am born with my material and will be useful." Everyone also accepted " is born with my talents and will be useful ". If you change it back to "born with my talents", many people may not be able to accept it.
There are many more examples like this. For example, there is a passage in the Tao Te Ching of Laozi : is generous and has no corners; it is late to achieve great things; it is loud and sounds; it is invisible. Everyone is familiar with these sentences of . However, the unearthed silk book reads " is not enough to become ". In fact, from the analysis of these parallel words, comparing the meaning of "no, hope, and nothing", it seems that "no" is more appropriate. It can be spread for thousands of years, and everyone has accepted the expression of late success, but in fact, there is a fundamental difference between the two.
So many articles in ancient and modern times have been copied incorrectly during the process of circulating, but why do the media now repeatedly hype about "this person" and "being a person"?
Is there no news reports on the media? Do you have to work so hard to pick up words? is the wildfire in Hunan. Isn’t it enthusiastic enough? Is the epidemic prevention in various places not strict enough? Isn’t the lives of the epidemic people sad enough?
Perhaps the focus behind this is not "this person" and "being a person", but the passage that Mencius said later: " must first hurt his mind and mind, exhaust his muscles and bones, starve his body, empty his body, and act and disturb his actions. "
I have to say that Mencius's words are well said, which inspired many people in difficulties. However, it is rare to be a person who can really be a great task from heaven. For others, this passage from Mencius is just a bowl of chicken soup. There is only the effect of psychological comfort.
Now, isn’t the situation in many people right?
New crown Three years, I felt it "hard my heart and mind"; I felt it "worked my muscles and bones"; I felt it "hungry my body"; I felt it "empty and empty my body"; I felt it "whatever my actions are messed up".
Do you understand? Nowadays, many people's lives have become hard, hard, hungry, and empty, and everything is not going well. In this case, a little chicken soup is urgently needed to soothe the soul.
So we have to let everyone revisit Mencius's words ", because heaven will give great responsibilities to this person, ." Now it is so hard that it is because heaven will give great responsibilities to you! It’s God who is testing you!
media can't say so directly, no one believes that. So I discussed collectively whether it was a "person" or a "person", so I reviewed this passage.
All kinds of media and self-media have bombarded them, and everyone remembered this passage to . Take a sip of old chicken soup for thousands of years. This may comfort those who are isolated, hungry, unemployed, bankrupt, and desperate.
But this effect seems to be relatively limited, better than nothing. If we can really survive these sufferings, most of them will depend on the desire to survive. How many people will bear the great responsibility of heaven?
