
saw an article in which the author claimed to be a member of Foxconn " Jingtan Class " and wrote about Foxconn's recent situation. Although there is no way to verify it, I still feel that there is a certain credibility.
What is the epidemic situation in Zhengzhou Foxconn? A graduate student in the factory said this... The article
probably contains the following information:
Foxconn always ranks first in terms of output;
uses money to motivate employees to work, and there is an additional full attendance bonus for work. The policies of attendees and not attendees are different. There is no epidemic prevention materials or free meals when not working;
For most people, they want to avoid being hungry or eating free meals, and want to avoid not being able to make nucleic acid, and working is the best way out;
The workshop where the group is waiting for has a positive mixed-pipe pipe. The group is very scared and dare not go to the workshop to work, but the leader still strongly demands to enter the workshop and continue to set positions. The statement
is more in line with the Foxconn culture I have learned.
Also saw another article:
Who wants Zhengzhou Foxconn to be shut down the most?
Who wants Zhengzhou Foxconn to stop? In fact, no one wants Foxconn to stop.
Foxconn and Apple are unable to withstand such a critical moment and will definitely not want it. Zhengzhou is under great financial pressure, lacks money, and needs Foxconn's tax revenue, and does not want to stop it.
This article says that the people who are obsessing with melons hope to shut down, and some officials hope to shut down. What the people and some officials hope for is successful epidemic prevention. If the epidemic prevention is not stopped, it will be successful, and they will definitely not want it to be successful.
is because no one wants to shut down, so under the shadow of the epidemic, Foxconn is still insisting on starting construction.
, but workers are also needed to start work. If workers want to go home, they don’t even need wages. They can’t be locked up in the factory, so they should work forcefully.
Foxconn Zhengzhou factory has 200,000 people, which is a small society. The factory’s policy is that output is the first priority and epidemic prevention is the second priority. For the sake of “economy”, isolation and epidemic prevention ranks second. Foxconn's current situation is a microcosm of the society after the liberalization.
The current state of the Foxconn factory is that economy (production) takes priority over epidemic prevention. Initial positive and close quarantine. Now, the close contacts are ignored, just stay in the dormitory. Later, even if there was no problem with the single screening of close contacts, they could go to work normally without quarantine. There were many people who were freely active in mixed-pipe positive.
This is actually very close to the state that some people expect. If the positive test is in quarantine, there is no one to take care of the close contacts, so it is relatively free. Of course, some people may wish to be positive and do not need quarantine. But no matter what, within the closed loop of Zhengzhou Foxconn is a special environment that is much looser than the existing epidemic prevention policies.
but the effect is not good. Workers are not willing to live in such a more "loose" environment, and they do not think it is a minor cold if they are infected. They would rather not make money than go back to their hometown to take refuge. After all, it doesn’t matter how many months you earn less money, and it’s a lifelong thing to lose your health. Workers are also humans, not NPCs in the game, nor machines. To make a salary of several thousand yuan a month, it is not necessary to risk being infected.
Some people hope that after the release, everyone will not care about the epidemic. The physical laborers insist on working while having a fever and cough, and continue to work hard to produce physical goods for the society. This has not become a reality in Foxconn. The blue-collar workers voted with their feet, carried their suitcases, walked hundreds of kilometers, and went home.
In fact, these blue-collar workers have less pressure on life. They don’t buy houses in big cities, they don’t have much mortgage, and many families have some savings, so they can hold on if they stay home for a few months. Those who really can't hold on are urban white-collar workers who take mortgage loans.
3
The liberalization party believes that the economy will get better after the liberalization. But what is the premise? No one cares about infection. I have a high fever and a severe cough, and I have to go to work honestly without taking sick leave. High fever and severe cough are all mild symptoms according to foreign standards and will be bombarded if you enter the hospital.
Foxconn is an example. If everyone doesn’t care, don’t test, and are sick, they still come out to work honestly, because most of Foxconn’s employees are very young, and the proportion of severe illness is estimated to be very low, the proportion of death is close to zero, and no one cares. If they are infected, they will still work hard, which will not affect the economy too much (Foxconn’s production). This is what Foxconn hopes for.
But it is obvious that Foxconn workers don't think so. It is better not to have a salary than to insist on the bonus of going to work than to go home. I would rather walk home. Similar things have happened in India and Vietnam. The same is true for
in the United States. American white-collar workers have not completely resumed work yet. They work at home at home every day, go to the office for one or two days a week, and get their salary permit. Blue-collar workers have no choice. When the epidemic is at its peak, if they don’t insist on working, they will have no salary. Almost everyone in the United States is in debt, and if you don’t work, you really can’t live. Even so, there are still a large number of poor people who are unwilling to go out to work at the risk of infection.
. Chinese people like to save money, and parents also have a tradition of supporting their children. During the outbreak of infection, I really don’t care how many people insist on going to work.
The manufacturing industry is different from the service industry, and many positions are difficult to replace temporarily. If large-scale employees take turns to take sick leave, it will definitely seriously affect production efficiency. After
is released, manufacturing factories that require workers cannot be immune to shocks.
Workers at Foxconn work hard to fight the risk of infection, earning themselves wages, earning their boss profits , and providing products to consumers around the world. Of course, it also provides taxes to the Chinese government.
is worth it for workers? After the release of
, the manufacturing industry was hit. Can China's supply chain still be as efficient and cheap as before? It's very likely that it's impossible. If it is liberalized and the epidemic is rampant, companies still want workers to work under the epidemic and have to pay higher wages.
China attaches great importance to manufacturing, and ensures the integrity of the manufacturing industry and provides more and more physical goods with high quality and low price to the world. This is quite right, trade is a win-win choice. To achieve this, should we rely on "letting go" or "dynamic clearance"?
is a good thing for the service industries such as catering, tourism, and offline retail, but it will impact the manufacturing industry and affect the output of physical goods. Large-scale infections and sick leave will affect the efficiency of manufacturing, and there are almost no exceptions in all liberalized countries.
Previous articles have written about the problems of China's economy. China's problem is sluggish demand, oversupply, and oversupply. Therefore, the high unemployment rate and less severe inflation are a typical state of recession. After the release, the supply shock was forced to reduce production capacity. As supply declines and demand rises, the economy may be able to balance.
Europe and the United States are just the opposite. It is because demand is greater than supply, and supply is insufficient, so inflation occurs. If China's supply chain is impacted, China's manufacturing industry will definitely be damaged, and Europe and the United States will be able to get better? It is impossible for manufacturing production capacity to migrate to Vietnam and India in an instant. Inflation in Europe and the United States is likely to be even more powerful.
China worked hard to prevent the epidemic, and everyone endured the inconvenience of life. It is becoming increasingly difficult to prevent the epidemic. While preventing the epidemic, it maintains production and supply, and continues to provide products with high quality and low price. Just like Foxconn in Zhengzhou, while preventing the epidemic, it also needs to maintain production, and cannot shortage Apple's iPhone supply.
China has relaxed its manufacturing efficiency, and the already very serious inflation in Europe and the United States is likely to hit a new high. China's economy may not necessarily improve after China's liberalization. But the economy of Europe and the United States is likely to be worse after China's liberalization than it is now. China's blockade is not only to protect its own manufacturing industry, but also to protect the supply of goods from global, especially in European and American countries.
However, China's epidemic prevention efforts have not received any gratitude from European and American countries. What China gets is abuse, ridicule and humiliation.
human room, not worth it.
The same is true for a small number of Chinese "white-collar elites". They just wanted to let go and travel abroad and get high everywhere. Even if the infection spreads, you can work from home. Anyway, the salary is still a lot, so you can still catch fish at any time.
As for those blue-collar workers who cannot work remotely from home, they think it's nothing to do. Didn’t the product grow from supermarket shelves ? As long as you have money, what else can't be bought? However, money is actually just a symbol.
Those who are the most vulnerable, have the least ability to survive alone, and rely on social organizations to survive the most are the most self-righteous and do not see the risks they face after the collapse of the social supply chain.
How many days can you hold on to those elite white-collar workers who live in high-end communities and live a refined life without water, electricity, network, and supplies?
Their exquisite lives depend on farmers to produce grain, and workers to produce a wide variety of commodities. Of course, this is an exchange in the commodity economy. It seems that there is no need to be grateful.
But what if one day workers and farmers are unwilling to work?
Some white-collar elites hope to let go. They think that at most they can work from home and can also take free fishing. Anyway, I think it's a small cold and don't need to take sick leave. There are workers and farmers producing goods for them. But for physical workers, if their bodies collapse, they lose everything.
After the release of the epidemic, the epidemic spreads, and workers and farmers feel that it is not worth it to work in the face of the epidemic?
5
Sometimes I think angrily, so I just let go. It’s really not worth it in the world.
has also allowed European and American countries to suffer an unprecedented supply chain impact, causing their inflation rate to soar a few more points, letting them know that those physical goods were not grown in the shelves, but were produced by blue-collar workers.
Workers returned to their hometowns to avoid the epidemic, making it impossible for enterprises to recruit workers and are forced to pay higher wages. Let some business owners who are dissatisfied with the epidemic prevention policy enjoy the pain of not being able to find someone to work even if they spend money.
curse epidemic prevention every day, so let go and let these people who scold every day see what the consequences will be.
Jin Yong commented on Yuan Chonghuan , recording Yuan Chonghuan's last moment. He rushed to the capital from Ningyuan , fought bloody battles, and repelled the Qing army's attack. Then he was falsely accused and sentenced to death by Lingchi.
Yuan Chonghuan was tied to the execution ground. Before the executioner could take action, the people of Beijing rushed forward and snatched his flesh and bit his internal organs. According to the regulations, the executioner cut off his muscles with one knife. The people surrounded him and shouted and yelled, paying for his meat, and only bought one piece of it for a penny. After buying it, they took a bite and cursed, "Traitor!"
Because the people of Beijing City determined that the Qing soldiers were deliberately attracted to the siege of the city last year. It is hard to say where such rumors came from. They were spread by ministers who hated Yuan Chonghuan and eunuchs ? Or is it the general public born to like to believe rumors? Or perhaps, the people of Beijing who have suffered major panic and losses need a target to vent?
on Yuan Chonghuan's ability is controversial on today's Internet. But almost all contemporary people have sympathy for Yuan Chonghuan's miserable fate. When I see the above text, I always think, for Yuan Chonghuan, is it worth it to pay the price of his life and defend these people in Beijing?
In the second year of Chongzhen, Yuan Chonghuan did not go to rescue Beijing and let the Qing army break the city. So what? It just brought history more than ten years ahead of time. After all, after , the Qing Dynasty entered the pass, , , , , , , , slaughtered three times, and killed millions of Han people, the Han people and , also coexisted harmoniously for more than two hundred years. When , the Qing Dynasty, still had a large number of Han people left behind, and they were in pain. Anyway, it will coexist sooner or later, so why resist?
Is it worth it?