People are famous and have many troubles. As a big businessman who runs a patriotic business, Sima Nan has recently been criticized. Many of the previous doubts revolved around his morality. Obviously, Sima Nan had no ideological burden. After deciding to harvest patriotic traffic, morality had long been left behind.
There are capable people in the masses. Someone found the mystery in Sima Nan’s video and found that he possessed domestic protected animals and listed relevant facts one by one.
There is a blogger in related fields. Through the video posted by Sima Nan himself, he found that the animal specimens collected in his home were all National protected animals . Among them are national first-class protected animals sika deer, Yangtze alligator , second-class protected animals white squid , and eagle. There is also a first-level key protected animal hawkschin.
The blogger gave relevant identification opinions and sentencing standards for holding these animal specimens. Sima Nan's fans began to defend him.
The first netizen said: Without evidence to prove it, these do not constitute illegal facts. This practice belongs to the presumption of guilt of and does not conform to the spirit of the law.
This fan is right and the logic is clear. But it doesn’t taste that way from Sima Nan’s fans. Let’s take “ Lenovo ”.
What evidence did Sima Nan come up with when he attacked Liu Chuanzhi and Lenovo? Has the calculation method he invented himself been officially recognized?
Sima Nan questioned the association with his own calculation method and asked Liu Chuanzhi to prove his innocence. Is this considered a presumption of guilt? Is this in line with the spirit of the law?
When we have to go through the procuratorate and the court in case handling, why did we get directly sentenced to Sima Nan? When Sima Nan's fans defended him, they said that they could not be guilty and inferred, so why did they have double standards for Liu Chuanzhi?
Let’s take a look at the second fan’s defense. He said: Suspicion cannot be used as evidence, and simple suspicion cannot be filed, not to mention that without verification, qualitative words that are unfavorable to others’ reputations have been used.
Seeing this fan's defense, he couldn't help but "associate".
When Sima Nan criticized Liu Chuanzhi, he just regarded suspicion as evidence. He used wishful thinking inference to suspect that Lenovo and Liu Chuanzhi were guilty and regarded inference as conclusion.
Sima Nan kept saying that the evidence had been handed over to the relevant departments and that Liu Chuanzhi would be dealt with. Nearly a year has passed since the matter has passed. Has the relevant departments activated the evidence submitted by Sima Nan and filed a case against Liu Chuanzhi?
If a case was filed against Liu Chuanzhi, Sima Nan would get a receipt form , why didn’t it be posted and told to fans? Could it be that his so-called evidence is speculation and suspicion?
Sima Nan fans defended that suspicion without evidence has damaged Sima Nan's reputation. Didn’t Sima Nan also disgrace Liu Chuanzhi’s reputation at that time? Before the relevant departments filed the case, Liu Chuanzhi had been labeled as a traitor. Is this considered an infringement of reputation?
Seeing this, Sima Nan's fans were a little anxious and released their ultimate move: Since Sima Nan slandered Liu Chuanzhi, why not sue Sima Nan?
Let’s use the same logic to ask Sima Nan: Since others question your illegal possession of wild animal specimens is defamation, why not sue others?
Sima Nan’s fans may have something to say: Sima Nan is a big man and has no time to pay attention to these social clowns.
According to this logic, can it be deduced that Liu Chuanzhi is a respected entrepreneur and has no time to pay attention to Sima Nan.
Is there any representative of mathematics class that has been popularized? Can it be deduced in this way: Sima Nan = social clown?
