Is our existence normal?

We all know that our human existence is very abnormal. This abnormality means that we have destroyed the balance of the natural world, polluted environmental resources through excessive development, and harmed the survival interests of other species. In addition, our world is in chaos and our survival is becoming more and more difficult. This kind of answer is obviously self-examination lateral thinking, and it answers what is wrong with us. It is us who use our existing logic to examine ourselves, use the logic of contradiction to examine contradictions, and try to use the logic of contradiction to resolve these contradictions. We have always been doing this, and we are still surviving in this way, and we can never extricate ourselves from this cycle of creating and resolving conflicts.

To see whether our survival activities are normal, we have to look at it from another perspective and see how this creature called a human has become like this. From self-examination to onlooker, we can see clearly what is wrong with us humans. As one of many biological species, what is wrong with us? We have been behaving more and more weirdly for thousands of years. If other creatures can express it as bystanders, they must not understand, why do humans survive like this? Other biological species are a whole, and their behavioral objects are heterogeneous organisms. For example, the wolf's behavioral object is sheep, the sheep's behavioral object is grass, the bird's object is food, the fish's object is bait, the bee's object is flowers... Wait, this is determined by the ethical logic of survival. Human beings have actually changed this ethical principle. The main objects of human behavior are human beings. The logical model of competition for survival pursued by human beings is not aimed at other living creatures. Human beings are by no means competing with tigers, leopards, wolves, flowers, birds, insects and fish. Human beings are competing with human beings for survival. , which is in line with our current newly coined word: rolled into . Man is the first and only creature with intense involution. This is very weird. All living things are competing with alien species for survival. This kind of competition is determined by the laws of nature and is necessary for the active operation of existence. Human beings, on the other hand, compete to the death within their own species, and base the meaning of their existence on this cruel competition.

Why is this? What is the purpose of the fierce competition within humans? What's the purpose? Is it beneficial to the long-term existence of the species when humans break down the overall existence of a population into living individuals and allow individuals to carry out competitive survival activities on the grounds of independent life? This decomposed combination of human society is an organizational form set up for competitive survival, which enables human competition to unfold comprehensively and uncontrollably. There has always been a competitive relationship between people from beginning to end. Even if they are related by blood, they cannot escape the logic of competition. All forms of social organization, marriage, family, groups, alliances, nations, and countries are competitive units of different sizes, and the intensity of competition often escalates based on interests. According to the original logic of existence, this ubiquitous and all-encompassing competition for interests should increase the interests. For example, the gathering of fresh fish, bird flocks, and bee swarms will greatly increase the overall interests and make foraging more efficient. Easy, making individuals safer. And when human beings gather into a society and form a competitive relationship, have the interests of life increased? Is individual existence more secure? The situation is exactly the opposite. Our cruel competition with each other results in consumption and destruction of interests. Individual life safety is the most serious threat in the competition, which has produced serious consequences. Our internal competition is the greatest price and sacrifice paid by the species, and it is the greatest damage and danger to the existence of the species.

Why should we engage in such competitive survival? On the other hand, can we survive competitively? If there is no competition between life and life, how can we ensure independent existence? How to ensure the interests of life? The logical pattern of competition for survival in the human world is an inevitable necessity of bioethics. It is impossible for life not to compete with life. We don’t know that our logic of life competition has completely rewritten the laws of existence of living things. If the human logic of life competition is implemented in the same biological species, there will be competition within fish schools, competition within bird colonies, competition within bee colonies, and competition within ant colonies. ...Same fish, which one is bigger, eats more, and swims faster.Birds in the same swarm, bees in the same swarm, and ants in the same swarm all compete and compare like this, fighting each other to the death. If so, will these biological populations still exist? There is no doubt that it will soon collapse and become extinct.

However, as a kind of living thing, we humans have invented this logical model of life competition, and have been competing for thousands of years, resulting in continuous gunfire, rivers of blood, and continuous disasters. We compete enthusiastically, generation after generation. From the moment we reach adulthood, we strive to be more capable, richer, smarter, more successful, and happier than others... This kind of "comparison" is the core logic of the human world. , everything is compared, compared with wealth, compared with glory, compared with sadness, compared with suffering, compared with despair and destruction. In order to compete, human beings have exhausted all wisdom, all means and all possibilities. What are the goals and results? It is to cause the human species to fall apart, suffer, collapse and be destroyed as soon as possible.

Is it normal for us to live this way? Are we still a functioning species? Is our species, with its great intelligence and advanced civilization, better than other species? More rational? More scientific? Is it more secure? Can it better maximize the interests of the group? Can it exist longer? Is it more in line with the fundamental principles of existence? Don't say that we are ashamed compared to other creatures. We are using our wisdom and civilized methods to push ourselves to a dead end. Who can answer: Is our existence normal? (continued)