Looking at the world, China is the best nation. Although it has encountered many wars and made an originally rich country impoverished, China once again stood up and ushered in a rise and revival. Today, China has become the world's second largest economy and the world's factory. These achievements are the envy of many countries, and they are also jealous. India is one of them. As a populous country second only to China, India's development has also attracted attention from the outside world.
China and India are regarded by the outside world as the most influential countries in Asia. In terms of comprehensive national strength, China has left India a few blocks away. You know, China is in a stage of rapid development. Even under the epidemic, China's economy has achieved positive growth "against the trend".
Looking back at India, the infrastructure is backward, the population is exploding and even the economy continues to be "Waterloo" affected by the epidemic. Even so, India still thinks that it will not lose to China and competes with China everywhere. However, reality slapped India and made it recognize that "China leads India." In order to catch up with China, Indian Prime Minister Modi copied China's development model. Unexpectedly, this time I was thrown cold water by my own media.
"The Times of India" recently published an article reminding the Modi government that "India is not China. Copying its industry and trade policies will incur sanctions." According to reports, the Modi government will spend 2 trillion rupees to support specific industries within 5 years. , Making it develop into a national leading enterprise, but the risk of doing so is great, because India is not China.
Prior to this, India had tried so-called "self-reliance" many times, but they all ended in failure. According to the report, Modi is trying to attract global foreign investors to take root in India and build India into a global export center with top technology and large-scale production.
is just that Modi has overlooked the most important thing, the market is open to each other, if only out and not in, which country would be willing to open the door to India. Take the recently signed RCEP as an example. Modi withdrew from the agreement, worried about the impact on the domestic market. The purpose of
RCEP is to create a free trade environment, so that there are no barriers between the signatories. India refuses to import products from other countries into its own country. When exporting to other countries, India will naturally be sanctioned. Modi did the opposite. Withdrawing from RCEP is undoubtedly isolating himself from the "super economic circle". The irony of
is that India has been catching up with China and wanted to achieve "self-reliance" as soon as possible. After 30 years of struggle, it turned out that its economic development was not as good as Bangladesh. As for what has gone wrong with India’s economy, it is mainly because India has taken a path that is not suitable for itself.
First of all, India has positioned itself in the "high-end" field. It started to engage in high-tech industries and eventually turned itself into the "Four Dissimilarities", while Bangladesh chose labor-intensive industries and finally got rid of poverty.
Secondly, India’s copying of China’s “homework” is not easy first and then difficult, but to copy the big questions after getting the test paper. The last point is that India wants to become a major exporter but does not open its market to the outside world. To copy China's industrial policy, capital is first required, but India obviously does not have it, so it is difficult for a country like India to develop.
