——For the Warriors
Lakers players’ performance outside the three-point line is:
① Westbrook 3 shot 1;
②Beverly 5 shot 1;
③James 10 shot 3;
④Hydrama 3 shot 0;
https://www.
https://www.
https://www.
https://www.
https://www.
https://www.
htps://www.
htps://www.
htps://www.
htps://www.. ml2⑤ Lonnie Walker made 0 in 3;
⑥Nunn made 3 in 6;
⑦Matt Ryan made 1 in 3;
⑧Rivers 2;
⑨Anderson 30;
⑩Sveder 10 in 1;
⑪Christy made 1 in 1;
totaled 10 in 40 shots, with a hit rate of 25%.
—For Clippers
Lakers players' performance outside the three-point line is:
① Westbrook's 0 shots 6;
②Beverly's 1 shot 6;
③James' 2 shot 8;
④Hydrama eyebrows 4 shot 2;
④Hydrama eyebrows 4 shot 2;
3 ml5 ⑤Loney Walker scored 2 in 9; ⑥Nunn scored 0 in 4; ⑦Matt Ryan scored 1 in 2; ⑧Rivers scored 0 in 1; ⑨Anderson scored 1 in 4; ⑩Damian Jones scored 0 in 1; totaled 9 out of 45 shots, with a hit rate of 20%. ——Trail Blazers
① Westbrook 0 shots;
②Beverly 1;
③James 92;
④Hydrama eyebrows 0;
⑤ Lonny Walker made 1 of 5;
⑥Nunn made 0 of 3;
⑦ Rivers made 2 of 4;
⑧Anderson made 0 of 1;
⑨Troy Brown made 2 0
, with a total of 6 of 33 shots, with a shooting percentage of 18.3%.
In total, the Lakers' performance outside the three-point line was 8.3 of 39.3 shots, with a shooting percentage of 23.7%. , hit number and hit rate are the last in the league, .
Based on this, it is not an exaggeration to say that the Lakers' three-point efficiency is the worst. In my opinion, the reason why
is related to two aspects.
First, in terms of management,
①Monk, averaging 2.3 three-pointers and a shooting percentage of 39.1% per game;
②Anthony , averaging 2.2 three-pointers and a shooting percentage of 37.5% per game;
③Ellington, averaging 1.9 three-pointers and a shooting percentage of 38.9% per game;
Not to mention ordinary pitchers like DJ Augustine and Bradley , just talk about the above three. With excellent three-pointers, the Lakers management gave up.
If Monk is restricted and does not have the full bird rights of and the salary space is limited cannot be retained, then Anthony and Ellington are both basic salary or can the Lakers stay or stay, especially when the two still have not found their boss.
Secondly, in terms of players,
Before Beverly joined the Lakers, his efficiency outside the three-point line was 1.6 goals per game and a shooting percentage of 37.7%. But after joining the Lakers, this efficiency dropped sharply to 1.0 goals per game and a shooting percentage of 21.4%.
In addition, there is Nunn.
During the preseason, Nunn's performance outside the three-point line was 2.2 of 5.4 shots and a shooting percentage of 40.7%. Among them, hits and hits are the best in the team.
Thanks to the hot touch on the outside, Nunn averaged 12.6 points per game in less than 20 minutes, which is the highest except for "Jack James". From the side, the Lakers gained a very efficient No. 3 scorer in the preseason.
However, after the start of the regular season, Nunn's performance outside the three-point line was 1.0 of 4.3 shots and a shooting percentage of 23.1%.
From the data, 40.7% to 23.1% , Nun's three-point efficiency has dropped significantly. Based on this, Nunn also completed the transition from the team's No. 3 scorer to a burden.
says it may be a bit cruel, but that's the truth.
My understanding is:
From the perspective of immediate combat power, the Lakers have lost a scorer who averages at least 12+ per game.
From a technical and tactical perspective, Nunn's round usage rate has been 22.6%, which means that the ball rights are needed. But the problem is that Rivers needs the ball to cultivate in the Lakers' substitute lineup.
Regarding the second point, it is impossible for the Lakers to deliberately reduce Rivers' ball rights. After all, after a season of baptism, Rivers has quickly grown into the team's main rotation player. In time, it is not impossible to grow into a player with the style of Caruso .
The problem arises.
If you intend to reduce Nunn's ball rights, let's take a look:
Although Nunn's shots came from receiving and shooting after receiving the ball without the ball, his shooting percentage was only 22.2%. On the contrary, the shooting percentage after holding the ball is 35%. To a certain extent, Nunn is still the who is more likely to be on the ball to attack.
If Nunn is transferred from substitute to starting, considering the outside defense, Beverly will not be removed and Westbrook will not be removed, then the one who will be removed is Lonnie Walker.
Nun VS Lonnie Walker
At least 193, Walker weighs 92 kg, is more suitable for swinging upwards to play the third position and defending the third position.
In other words, Nunn also has problems with starting, that is, he does not have the possibility of swaying the defense line upward.
It can be said that how to reduce the ball rights when playing as a substitute and how to swing upwards the starting lineup, the Lakers are in a dilemma. What I mean is: no matter how you operate , it cannot solve the problem relatively effectively .
Of course, the root cause of the problem is the sharp decline in Nunn's offensive efficiency, especially the outside efficiency. From the side, this is also one of the reasons that becomes a burden: The Lakers don’t know how to operate .
If Nunn continues to be in a downturn, in my opinion, Westbrook is not necessarily the one who is traded first.
From the perspective of salary, , Nunn still has a contract of 5.3 million yuan for one year, which is relatively easy to deal with;
From the perspective of trading, Westbrook's transaction is difficult, Walker has a contract protection period, Rivers and others have a small contract, only Nunn is suitable for trading.
Of course, just for Nunn's contract, there are also trading objects that meet the Lakers, such as Knicks 's Redish - rookie's contract for 5.9 million in the last year, directly matching .
and a height of 203 and a weight of 98 kg are the standard forward line. This type is also what the Lakers need at this stage.
Let me say something about Reddishdo and see the examples of the three defensive ends.
and DeRozan against 5 minutes and 29 seconds, limiting him to 2 of 6 shots;
and Klay Thompson against 2 minutes and 56 seconds, limiting him to 1 of 4 shots;
and Ingram against 3 minutes and 43 seconds, limiting him to only get a chance to get out of the phone once;
From the example, Redish defender's defense line player is indeed good. For the Lakers, when they encounter forwards like Leonard and Antetokounmpo, Reddish can lead the defense.
From the perspective of Reddish, when you are in a contract year and have few opportunities, switching to the Lakers is indeed a good choice. I mean, this opportunity is guaranteed when the Lakers lack a forward line, and the Lakers have high exposure. Once they play well, they can play a role in reproving themselves to the league. Then, there will be no worries about subsequent contracts, just like Monk, he completed the transformation from basic salary to nearly 10 million annual salary.
Finally, about Nunn, my understanding is:
It is not impossible to give up Nunn under Lonnie Walker, who has similar characteristics, especially the latter can be exchanged for a relatively good front line.
In addition, about Nun himself, if the offensive efficiency is not high and does not have a certain defensive ability, then the presence of the audience is really not high. Moreover, as mentioned just now, it is not appropriate to play as a starting player or a substitute when the efficiency is not high.
