People who have been deemed to be paid all day long will know, since they have paid the fee, why should they be treated as such?
I tell you that if you pay the fee again, it can only be deemed as the payment period. As long as you know the calculation of pensions during retirement and the calculation formulas and methods of adjusting pensions every year, you will know. Social Security Law officially implemented the payment of labor insurance funds without a personal account, and the entire labor insurance funds for the retirement wages are contained in the public accounts of retired workers. Therefore, the retirement salary and pension can only be calculated based on the payment period.
Payment before the implementation of the Social Security Law can of course be deemed to be the payment period. It is logically unreasonable and legal to say that the actual payment period for social security is not logically reasonable and legal. Because these payments are of course not payments after the implementation of the Social Security Law, it is definitely illogical and legal to regard the payments before the implementation of the Social Security Payment as the payment period for the social security payment. It is definitely illegal and logical to say that social security fees have been paid for many years before the implementation of the Social Security Law. Of course, it can only be unified by using the deemed payment period. In fact, deemed as payment period means that all those who participate in the labor insurance premium who are deemed as payment period are treated as the same as payment period. However, because there is no personal account, it is unfair for these people who pay the fees to pay the fees according to the unified accounts and personal accounts after the implementation of social security. The state has added the transitional pension within the period deemed payment. Transitional pension is actually a compensation from the state for old retired workers who participated in the handover of new and old labor insurance payment systems.
The old workers who are deemed to be paid during the payment period are not just because they did not pay the fees and were consuming for nothing, but because the calculation of pensions is a loss compared to the insured persons in the later social security system, so the state gives subsidies for the period of deemed payment period.
says that before the reform of the social security system, workers paid fees, but the difference in the pension management system is the previous retirement wage.
I would like to ask, those who question the retirement salary and pensions that have not paid during the period of payment are paid first and then retirement pensions. Then a 20-year-old employee who has been working in 1955 can just retire in 1995. Social security does not implement payment. According to the national laws and policies at that time, he can definitely receive his retirement salary based on his 40-year salary. Doesn’t the money that social security employees pay for 40 years in accordance with the previous system? This makes no sense in terms of law, logic, or actual situation.
I dare say that people who question the deemed payment period only dare to yell on the Internet. You ask him to consult the Social Security Bureau. Ask once or twice and you will explain it to you, but you may not understand it based on your level. If you dare to go to the Social Security Bureau every day to mess around and say that others are deemed to be a payment period and eat for free, I believe you may be detained in for the crime of disrupting public order according to .
