When talking about the United States, many people still talk about how powerful the United States is in terms of high technology and chips, and then they cannot afford to kneel down. What is this like?
This is like some people saying: The Japanese devils have better guns than us and they will lose if they fight again; Chiang Kai-shek has better guns than the Red Army and the Red Army cannot defeat the Kuomintang; the volunteers weapons are not as good as the United Nations army, cannot win the war to resist U.S. aggression and aid Korea. History has proven that people with this kind of thinking are either traitors or idiots. Similarly, some people now say: America's high technology is better than ours, so the United States is still strong.
We can give a few examples:
1. World War II Germany was defeated, and German scientists were divided between the United States and the Soviet Union. Can technology determine everything? Can science and technology ensure that Germany is undefeated?
2. Japan was defeated, and the legacy of 731 was taken away by the United States and became the basis of biological laboratories across the United States in the future. Can Japan's biochemical weapons make Japan undefeated?
3. Nokia mobile phones are no longer available. and Nokia have sold all their inventions in exchange for some funds. Can technology keep Nokia at the top?
4. Japanese companies have always attached great importance to technology, but technology has not made Japanese companies invincible.
5. During the Warring States Period, , half of the world's wealth was in Qi State , and a war between Yan and Qi robbed Qi State. When national power declines, not only wealth but also technology cannot be preserved.
Therefore, technology is an important factor, but it is not a decisive factor, just like aircraft and artillery cannot determine the final victory of the war. If technology could decide everything, then Chiang Kai-shek would not retreat to Taiwan, and the United States should occupy North Korea. So still saying that the United States is high-tech does not mean that the United States is awesome. The two have no direct relationship at all, and they cannot be equated.
The reason why some people think this way is because they only have technology in their eyes, and they don’t know about comprehensive national strength, military power, industrial base, culture and politics. They don’t know if they don’t read. News, because they can only see the sky as big as a palm, it’s like living in the old society, they are still reluctant to throw away their pacifiers after they are weaned, or they are reluctant to cut off the pigtails on their heads even after the Qing dynasty is over. This is the old society. The old and the young are left behind. These old people but young people never refresh their world view. The world has changed, but they died yesterday. It has been all these years, but they are still living in the era of "Beijingers in New York".
Technology cannot allow a country to maintain its advantage, and technology cannot allow a company to remain standing, because technology is only one part of it. Artificially enlarging this circle is the wishful thinking of many people. Just like Russia's missile is also awesome, but Russia has not achieved global dominance.
At that time, Japan's plasma TVs were also technologically advanced. LCD screens dominated the market, and plasmas had no choice but to fade away. Putting everything else aside and talking about technology is something only a frog in the well can do.
Ordinary technologies are not at the strategic level at all. Nuclear bombs and satellite navigation are still at the strategic level. Civilian technologies are not at the strategic level at all. What's more, China is making breakthroughs in various fields, so it won't take long to catch up. Super foreign top technology.
The top six chip technology talents in the United States are all Chinese
Besides, the generals of a country will return to the country, and the wise will avoid the generals of the country. The decline of the United States cannot stop the outflow of its talents, just like a dying enterprise cannot retain scientific research talents. Whoever gives good treatment and can retain people will have talent and technology. Does technology have to be American? The conditions provided by China are good, and if the talents are brought in, they will become Chinese.
