A few days ago, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Ma Xiaoguang, reiterated the fact that the sovereignty of Taiwan Island belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the "Republic of China" as t

2024/05/0414:47:33 history 1201

A few days ago, Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Ma Xiaoguang reiterated the fact that Taiwan Island sovereignty belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the "Republic of China" as the only legal government of China, and therefore enjoyed rights over the Taiwan Island. sovereignty.

The Democratic Progressive Party authorities, which are poisoning Taiwan compatriots with their "radical Taiwan independence" stance, naturally cannot listen to the mainland's strong stance of presenting facts to refute the "two-nation theory", so its subordinate "Mainland Affairs Council" issued a so-called statement, saying that "the mainland He advocated "the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are not subordinate to each other" on the grounds that he has never ruled Taiwan for a day, and demanded that the mainland face up to the existence of the "Republic of China" and deal with the differences faced by the two sides. After

, the "Foreign Affairs Department" of the backstage authorities reiterated the same old tune, claiming that "it is common knowledge that the mainland has never ruled Taiwan for a day, and the relevant mainland departments should conduct a profound review of this proposition."

A few days ago, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Ma Xiaoguang, reiterated the fact that the sovereignty of Taiwan Island belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the

Of course, the DPP has long been accustomed to making such ridiculous remarks. After all, under its education and propaganda policies centered on historical nihilism, I am afraid that it does not even know where it came from and where it is going in the end. Going forward will only repeat illogical and erroneous arguments in an attempt to cover up its status as an "illegal organization" in order to maintain the "legitimacy" of governing in Taiwan.

But we know very well that no matter how much the DPP advocates the "two-state theory", it is impossible to turn "Taiwan independence" into reality. Not to mention the firm determination of the 1.4 billion Chinese people to reunify, the People's Liberation Army alone can crush the strength of the Taiwan military. It is enough to scare the "Taiwan independence" elements.

In other words, if the DPP is determined to implement the "Taiwan independence" policy to the end, the fate of die-hard "Taiwan independence" elements such as Tsai Ing-wen, Su Tseng-chang, Wu Zhaoxie, and You Xikun will be doomed, and no one can save them.

A few days ago, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Ma Xiaoguang, reiterated the fact that the sovereignty of Taiwan Island belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the

However, compared with the DPP’s insistence on rehashing old tunes and seeking death, the KMT’s response to the Taiwan Affairs Office is something that we should really be vigilant about. Because the reasons for its speech are exactly the same as those of the DPP, the severity can almost be judged. It is a landmark event from "mild Taiwan independence" to "radical Taiwan independence".

The Kuomintang has always regarded itself as the " reunification " on the island. Even if it has differences with the mainland on cross-strait issues, it at least does not regard "Taiwan independence" as a clear guideline for political activities. However, in its so-called "statement " quoted the DPP's fallacy that "the mainland has never ruled Taiwan" and advocated that "the Republic of China has always been a sovereign and independent country, and Taiwan has no relationship with the mainland."

Obviously the Kuomintang’s absurd argument inherited the fallacy that “the Republic of China is Taiwan and Taiwan is the Republic of China” put forward by former Taiwan leader Lee Teng-hui, but was not entirely derived from the Democratic Progressive Party. Therefore, this matter is likely to be a sign of The KMT will shift its stance towards "radical Taiwan independence".

A few days ago, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Ma Xiaoguang, reiterated the fact that the sovereignty of Taiwan Island belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the

The reason is that the Kuomintang retreated to the island of Taiwan after being defeated in the civil war. Naturally, it is very clear that Taiwan and the mainland are connected by blood, but now it openly denies history and falsely claims that "Taiwan is the Republic of China." It has adopted the historical nihilism policy of the Democratic Progressive Party and is rushing towards the stance of "radical Taiwan independence".

A closer look at the factors behind the change in the Kuomintang's stance revealed that it was nothing more than a loss of centripetal force and an "empty shell" that had no political goals and only competed for power and profit.

To put it bluntly, the current situation of repeated defeats by the Democratic Progressive Party in major and small elections on the island has made the Kuomintang have self-doubt. It believes that it cannot defeat the Democratic Progressive Party's "Taiwan independence" stance because it adheres to the "92 Consensus" This position was not popular, so came up with the idea of ​​​​turning to the "Taiwan independence" stance, trying to "defeat magic with magic" and strive for the opportunity to return to the island's ruling party.

A few days ago, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Ma Xiaoguang, reiterated the fact that the sovereignty of Taiwan Island belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the

In addition, judging from the actual situation, the Kuomintang's shift to "Taiwan independence" also includes considerations to win the support of the United States, because at present and even in the future, the United States very much needs "radical Taiwan independence" to destabilize the situation across the Taiwan Strait. The DPP happens to meet this requirement, so naturally The United States is willing to support it.

Therefore, in order to win the support of the United States, some people within the Kuomintang will naturally advocate turning to a "radical Taiwan independence" stance and "compete" with the Democratic Progressive Party for favor in front of the United States, thereby striving for opportunities to rise to power. But even if the Kuomintang turns to "radical Taiwan independence", I'm afraid the United States will not take a second look. After all, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party is more determined in comparison. Why should it go to such trouble to support an opposition party?

In fact, there is a deeper reason why the Kuomintang intends to turn to the "radical Taiwan independence" approach, which is that it is worried about its status after reunification, because even if it is only an opposition party in Taiwan, there will always be someone who will become the "Taiwan Emperor" Chance.

A few days ago, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Ma Xiaoguang, reiterated the fact that the sovereignty of Taiwan Island belongs to China, emphasizing that when the People's Republic of China was founded, it had replaced the

Once the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are reunified, everything will not be so easy to say. Therefore, the Kuomintang will crazily want to maintain the status quo, and will even lean on "Taiwan independence". This is enough to see that in the eyes of these people, their own interests far outweighs national interests.

However, what is certain is that no position of the Kuomintang can stop the reunification of the motherland. If it must be in line with the DPP, and the two are characterized as the same in the future, then it will be self-inflicted.

history Category Latest News

Will you take a breath when you see this? At 13 years old, you are already commanding soldiers to protect your home and country. When you were 13 years old, you were probably still writing notes to girls in school. Of course, this is not to belittle everyone, after all, the age D - DayDayNews

Will you take a breath when you see this? At 13 years old, you are already commanding soldiers to protect your home and country. When you were 13 years old, you were probably still writing notes to girls in school. Of course, this is not to belittle everyone, after all, the age D

The 19-year-old big-headed soldier criticized the commander's command error and was promoted to three levels in three sentences. At the age of 40, he became the founding general of the People's Republic of China.