After purchasing a new mobile phone, I believe that the first software installed by many people is WeChat, because people cannot do without WeChat if they want to socialize. The total number of registered users of WeChat has exceeded 1.2 billion, but the total number of people in China is only 1.4 billion, which means that basically 8.5 people out of every ten people use WeChat. This penetration rate is equal to that of any software. There is no way to reach the height. However, as more and more people use WeChat, the community environment of WeChat has become more complicated. There are many people who don't like it, so this forces users to delete, block or block each other.
However, according to the survey, although WeChat has a delete function, many people like to block the other party. Why is this? After knowing the reason, I discovered that it turns out that it is more ruthless to block black!
After deleting the other party first, there will be no such person in his address book. If the other party contacts him, they will pop up a prompt to verify the friend. When the other party receives this message You know you have been deleted, this way is more straightforward. But the most hateful thing about blocking is that the other party can continue to send messages to themselves, but a prompt box will pop up that "message has been sent, but rejected by the other party", so the message sent to you by the other party will not be received. But if you still have a message to send to the other party, you can still send it. This kind of unequal communication will make the blocked person feel very uncomfortable. This is also the most cruel thing about blocking. After all, if the deleted person still has something to vent, he can send it to the other party in the verification box when he re-adds his friend. After being blocked, he has no choice but to be anxious.
Secondly, the permissions for deleting and blocking Moments are also different. If you delete the other party, you will no longer find this person in your WeChat, let alone know any information about the other party, you can't chat, you can't check your friends circle. But if you block the other party, you have locked up all your permissions, and the other party can no longer understand any of your own dynamics, and cannot see the circle of friends or chat. But I can still view the other's circle of friends silently, and it is also an asymmetrical way that makes people feel more annoying.
This is not the most ruthless place. The most ruthless place to block black is that the other party has control. If you delete a person, and later regret that you want to add the other party back, you must pass Re-add friends, so you may not be able to survive, and you may not be able to find the other party's contact information. But if you block it and you want to add it back, you can simply remove it from the blacklist. If the other party hasn't contacted you recently, you won't know it, and the other party doesn't know what happened. And that is to say, blocking can be completely based on the mood of the other party, and the other party can only be forced to accept.
So on the whole, although the way to delete the opponent is more straightforward and simple, if you want to be harsh, it is definitely better to block black. After all, if you are blocked by the other party and you want to add it back, you can only wait for the other party to remove yourself from the blacklist. Such an unequal treatment is the most ruthless place. What do you think about this? What?
