The relationship between men and women is probably the simplest and most complex relationship in the world. To say that it is simple is just something that can be accomplished based on instinct under the initial setting of human beings.
says that it is complicated because after humans have civilization and law, the relationship between men and women begins to become very subtle. From morality to law, there may be countless forms of expression in the relationship between men and women at any level. Even worse things, things like men and women, you often can’t explain clearly.
After all, since humans learned to use leaves to cover private parts, men and women are relatively private when they have sex, and only two people are present throughout the whole process. Therefore, the truth of many things is often difficult to understand.
It is precisely because of this extreme privacy that once the parties involved have inconsistent statements, it is difficult to determine who is true, especially when the woman calls the police and says that the other party rapes it, it will be very troublesome.
The following case is a very typical case. Many people think that as long as the woman agrees, the man will not constitute rape. This idea is actually wrong.
The following case is very telling the situation. Basic case:
Feng met Ms. Li through chat software, all of whom were adults. Feng won Ms. Li's favor through chat. Feng told Ms. Li that he was the only one at home and invited Ms. Li to play at home.
Ms. Li agreed readily. The two had sex at Feng's house. Afterwards, Ms. Li asked Feng for 20,000 yuan, but was rejected by Feng. Ms. Li called the police in anger and violated herself.
The first instance court held that although Ms. Li came to Feng's home herself, it did not mean that she agreed to have sex with Feng. Feng violated Ms. Li's wishes and took compulsory measures to have sex with Ms. Li, which constituted rape. Feng was sentenced to three years in prison for . Feng appealed without permission. After the trial, the second instance court ruled that Feng was not accused in accordance with the law. This is the basic situation of the case of
. Does it seem scary? Feng almost faced prison because of his impulse. This is the relationship between men and women. In a private space, many things cannot be explained clearly.
The crime of rape, the legal benefit it violates is the sexual autonomy of women, that is, as long as the woman disagrees, the act of a man forcibly having sex is rape.
violates the will of women and is the core point of this sin. The will of women in this, including many aspects, means that women have their own right to decide who, when, where, and in which way to have relationships with. If they say they do not agree, that means they do not agree.
In this case, the first instance court held that although both parties were chatting online, they might be adults and everyone knew what would happen next, Ms. Li's behavior of taking the initiative to go to Feng's home cannot be presumed that Ms. Li agreed to have sex with Feng.
Take a step back and say that even if Ms. Li agreed when she entered the door, she had the right to decide on specific behaviors such as the location, method, method, and method of the relationship.
For example, is it a condom? If the woman insists on wearing a condom and the man disagrees and eventually forcibly having sex, it is against the woman's will, or resistance to the location.
In other words, Ms. Li took the initiative to enter Feng's room alone, and this behavior does not mean that Ms. Li recognized all the behaviors, methods and locations of men and women. During this period, as long as she clearly expressed her disagreement, the man forcibly entered again would be contrary to the will of the woman and was suspected of rape.
This is the whole thing. Many people have misunderstandings. Many people think that the better the two of them are on the Internet, and that is, everything is going well. In fact, this is not the case. Be careful.
Many people may think that when introducing the case, they said that this was the police that Ms. Li asked for 20,000 yuan but failed to get it. But the problem is that when introducing the case, we said it from the perspective of God, and it was based on the facts determined by the court after the case was closed.
The reason why the first instance court found rape was because the woman bit her to death, and she had clearly expressed her disagreement and strong resistance.
is hard to explain at all, and the relationship has indeed happened. Both parties have different opinions. It is likely that it will be very unfavorable to the man. The second instance can be reversed and the acquitted person is also lucky.
Because even if the action after asking for money is valid, it cannot be completely ruled out that the woman completely agrees during the incident. There is room for discussion in this matter. I can only say that Feng bought a big lesson and should not easily make an appointment online in the future.
What do you think about this case? Welcome to leave a message to communicate.
