A tricked B to the shore of a reservoir without a guardrail. While the two were arguing, B accidentally fell into the water because they could not swim and drowned. Afterwards, people began to discuss who was wrong with A and B.
The first person thinks A is wrong and has to bear all the responsibility. He believes that it is a mistake to trick B into the shore of a reservoir without protective measures, and it is even more wrong to not protect B's personal safety in this process.
The second person thinks both are correct. After the incident, he surrounded the guardrail by the reservoir to prevent such a thing from happening again.
The third person thinks B is wrong. He shouldn't have been tricked by A to the reservoir, nor should he be careless and fell into the river. The least thing is that he can't even swim.
If you hold the first view, then you belong to a critic. The critics in society will only analyze right or wrong from the surface of things and make severe criticisms of the parties at fault from the perspective of his view of justice.
If you agree with the second view, you belong to a manager. From the manager's perspective, what has happened cannot be changed, and what he needs to do is how to avoid this kind of thing happening again.
If you have the same idea as the third person, then you are a businessman. Businessmen only weigh the pros and cons, and it shouldn't be fooled into a reservoir without precautions, which means they don't have a strong sense of prevention. If you accidentally fall into the water, it means you are not cautious enough in doing things. If you fall into the water, you will be drowned because you can't swim, which means you have no ability to resist risks.
In real life, most people have criticism thinking, and only look at things on the surface and subjectively distinguish right from wrong. They will not think further about the reasons for the problem, nor will they think about ways to solve the problem based on the problem.
Only a very small number of people have the mindset of managers and businessmen. Managers can dig deep into the causes of things based on superficial phenomena and make corresponding improvement plans based on problems that have already arisen. And further extend the thinking, will there be such safety omissions in other aspects?
Businessmen will think based on their own interests, and in the eyes of businessmen, they will not accept being deceived into a strange place. It is even more stupid to waste time and sacrifice life, which they cannot tolerate. According to the businessman's thinking, you can't blame others for your losses, you can only blame yourself for being deceived too easily.
The same is true when we look at national affairs and daily affairs. In the face of the Russian-Ukraine war, most people in the country will speak out for Russia, believing that the United States and NATO are too bullying, and they are veritable bad people.
And the country is obviously the manager's mind. Since the United States can deal with Russia in this way, will it be able to deal with us in the same way? What managers need to do is to check for shortcomings and fill in the gaps and prevent such incidents from happening to themselves.
Businessmen will think about what impact the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has on themselves, and whether they should spend too much time paying attention to this matter. If it is related to yourself, find out the part that is beneficial to you. If you have nothing to do with yourself, you will not be able to argue with others for a short time.
After reading these, what kind of thinking do you have?
