's career without being punished is imperfect.
Everyone will have more or less the experience of being punished by the teacher during their study. This is considered to be one of the effective ways for teachers to exercise their rights and let students learn lessons. In most cases, parents also understand this, but the amount of punishment is appropriate, and each parent has a different acceptance level.
For example, this parent was very unhappy. Her child made a mistake in a math question in the math exam. The teacher thought he had made a low-level mistake that he should not have made, so he punished him for copying this set of wrong questions and solutions a hundred times.
After the child came home from school, he kept doing the teacher’s homework. It took him a long time to complete it, and his hands hurt even when he wrote it.
This parent felt very distressed when he saw this and questioned the teacher's approach: If you did a math problem wrong, shouldn't you find some questions of the same type to practice? I won't test the original questions in the exam. Besides, is it a violation of the regulations if you copy it 100 times?
From the photos posted by this parent, it can be seen that her child’s homework copying was written in a densely packed large pages of homework books, and the project volume was really considerable. At the same time, the question itself is indeed simple, it is a division question "5/8÷8/5". As long as you are a little serious, you won’t do any mistakes in questions like
. No wonder the teacher is angry and wants to give him a “learning”.
This matter has aroused discussion among netizens, and there are both support and opposition.
The party who supports the teacher's approach believes that only if one punishment is in place can the child "gets a memory". This is how he came from back then, and he didn't think there was anything wrong with it. The parents are too "giant".
The party who opposes the teacher's approach believes that students are punished for copying as soon as they make mistakes. This is to treat students as machines, which will damage their interest in learning related subjects. They will be scared when they see the teacher in class, which is a manifestation of the teacher's incompetence.
How should we view the teacher’s method of copying? Is it necessary to copy the penalty?
As the saying goes: One mistake brings wisdom. During the learning process, every child will inevitably make mistakes, and problems like being careless seem irrelevant, but in fact they are very fatal to their children's growth and development. At the smallest, they affect their academic performance, and at the largeest, they affect their future work and career. Moreover, they will not only affect themselves, but also drag others down. Therefore, when appropriate, teachers give students "hard medicine" and let students "get a memory" can serve as a good warning, allowing students to restrain themselves in the future and be more careful when doing the questions.
But everything is too much or too little. Although punishment has the effect of admonition, it must also have a degree. If the punishment is too strong, it will hurt students' interest in learning and self-confidence and develop a mentality of learning. And now the children are under great pressure to learn. Teachers of all subjects have assigned a lot of homework. If the degree of coordination between the homework tasks assigned by the punishment and other teachers is not handled properly, and if the teachers of each subject use this method to make students "memorize", it will invisibly increase the students' learning burden and it will not be worth the loss.
Generally speaking, appropriately implementing punishment measures when students make mistakes and allowing students to "get a memory" is not only a teacher's professional right, but also a necessary means in teaching, but there must be a degree. Whether this "degree" is appropriately grasped reflects whether a teacher is excellent or not.
