became the vice principal, should I still teach classes? According to relevant regulations, it is generally required. If the vice principal teaches, will the teaching results be very good? It's hard to say. Recently, two netizens each posted an update on an online platform, both of which were related to "Vice Principal Teaching". is in class 1
The publisher of the first post is called "Little Leek Kansaw", and the content is as follows:
The vice principal teaches classes, what to teach, and what to count down. As a result, he is rated as a key teacher! I teach much better than him, and I can’t even get a teaching award. It’s unreasonable! God cannot tolerate it! Or choose to lie down!
The poster of another post is called "Cha Shu", and he wrote this:
Our vice principal in charge of teaching leads a math class by himself, and he always ranks last in the grade, but this does not affect his performance analysis at all. There was a lot of talk at the meeting. Later, he placed a math teacher who had been unable to teach for a long time in the same grade as him. He finally progressed to the second to last grade, proving the feasibility of his teaching theory ! Later, he was transferred to another school as a deputy. His grades were very stable and he remained at the bottom of his grade.
Class 2
As a vice principal, and also the vice principal in charge of teaching, the teaching effect is so poor, isn't this "a layman managing the expert"? After these two updates were released, they aroused widespread attention and heated discussions among netizens. Everyone expressed their opinions on this, mainly including the following opinions.
It is commendable, at least he still has the courage to stand on the podium
Although the education authorities have regulations that middle-level cadres such as deputy principals must lead classes, there are still many deputy principals in schools who do not lead classes. This is known to everyone The phenomenon.
Vice principals are unwilling to teach classes for many reasons. Some lack learning, have outdated knowledge, and are not familiar with current teaching materials; some are older and are not good at using modern teaching platforms, and their teaching methods cannot keep up with the times; some have been away from the front line of teaching for a long time, and they can no longer control their temper and are patient. I can't stand being lonely, I can't endure hardship...
Classes3
For the above reasons, some vice-principals are not sure whether they can give good classes. Instead of going to the podium, they might as well not teach classes at all, so as not to be thankless.
And the two vice-principals mentioned above, although their teaching performance is not ideal, at least they still have the courage to stand on the podium. Compared with those who "stay away" from the podium, they are indeed commendable and worthy of praise.
Ranking does not represent everything. "Teaching at the bottom" does not necessarily mean that the teaching level is low.
Some netizens believe that ranking does not represent everything. It is normal for the vice principal to teach at the bottom. This may be due to the following factors.
It may be that the student’s subject foundation is not good. In many schools, the purpose of teaching classes by the vice-principal is to evaluate professional titles. To evaluate professional titles, teaching notes and class hours are required, which have little to do with teaching performance. With this purpose in mind, the vice-principal asked for a "normal class". The academic foundation of students in "ordinary classes" is generally weak. If they can teach well, they are good at it. If they cannot teach well, it is their duty and there is no pressure.
Inspecting teaching
Maybe the vice principal has too many things to do. The vice principal is a middle-level manager of the school and is responsible for many trivial matters on a daily basis. Meetings, receptions, arranging various activities, organizing materials, etc. Management is the "main business", and it is impossible to focus on teaching like ordinary teachers, which has a great negative impact on the teaching effect.
It may be that the vice principal gave up his time to other teachers. If students want to achieve better results, classroom learning alone is not enough. They also need to review and practice after class to consolidate classroom knowledge in a timely manner. Which subject students spend more time on after class will have better results in that subject. The vice-principal's poor performance in the subjects he taught may be because he gave up a lot of after-school time to other teachers in the same class. From this point of view, he is really a person who puts others before himself and "talks about the overall situation."
From this point of view, the poor teaching effect of the vice principal really has many objective factors. "Being last in teaching" does not mean that their teaching level is low, nor does it mean that they are not qualified for teaching management positions.
Teaching Analysis Meeting
The vice principal's poor teaching effect has a huge negative impact and is an abnormal phenomenon
Some people think that the vice principal should either not teach classes, but must teach well if he wants to, and must teach results that are ahead of ordinary teachers. Otherwise, it is an abnormal phenomenon and will have a great negative impact.
It misleads people and harms students. When teachers perform poorly in teaching, students are the first to suffer. The vice-principal has many things to do and treats teaching as a "side job", which leads to students falling behind in performance. This is also a mistake. As the leader of the school, the vice-principal is ranked last in the subject he leads. This is extremely irresponsible to the students.
It affects the personal image of the vice-chancellor. In people's minds, vice principals are superior, especially the vice principals responsible for teaching, who should be higher than ordinary teachers in terms of teaching ability and knowledge level. If their actual teaching effect is far worse than that of ordinary teachers, or even ranks last, they will certainly be considered unworthy of being vice principals, and their high-level image in the minds of teachers and students in the school will be greatly reduced.
Class 4
It makes the vice principal feel less confident in management. As the vice principal of teaching management, 's teaching philosophy is directly related to the school's teaching quality, and the teaching quality is related to the school's survival. In daily work, the vice-principal will inevitably "talk loudly" at various teaching meetings. If the vice-principal's own teaching effect is poor, his teaching theory will arouse doubts among teachers and students, and they will lack the confidence to manage.
It will greatly suppress teachers’ teaching enthusiasm. The vice principal’s teaching performance is far lower than that of ordinary teachers, but he is superior to others in evaluating professional titles and excellence. If he goes back and forth, he will make the teachers think that "there is no justice" and simply "just lie down". To a large extent It suppresses teachers' teaching enthusiasm and is very detrimental to the improvement of the school's overall teaching performance.
Conclusion
The beholder has a different opinion, and a wise man has his own opinion. The vice-principal always comes last in teaching. Is this normal? Everyone is welcome to participate in the review and put forward your own opinions.
Class 5
(The pictures in the text are all from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please inform us to delete them.)
