But recently, my friends found that they memorized the ancient texts they memorized incorrectly! Is it "Therefore, heaven will give great responsibilities to this man" or "Therefore, heaven will give great responsibilities to this man"
This online debate originated from a netizen's article "What a big thing happened, our time and space seem to have been moved by people". What this netizen said in the article that the ancient text "Therefore, heaven will give great responsibilities to this man" recited in junior high school has become "...so man"
This statement quickly resonated with readers. Especially the memories of those born in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s have always been "...this person", including me, and I have always believed that "therefore God will give great responsibilities to this person"
Could it be that our memories collectively have deviated, and our time and space are really moved by people? Or is there a different version of the textbook?
In my memory, I have always said that "Heaven will give great responsibilities to this person."
0 Reciting ancient Chinese texts in junior high school is a headache, but you will be punished if you recite them. Sometimes I can’t even go home after school, but only after memorizing it is memorized by the teacher, I will only go home after checking it, so there will be no deviation in the memory.
What we learned at that time was ", because heaven will give great responsibilities to this person. We must first suffer their hearts and minds, exhaust their muscles and bones, hungry their bodies, and empty their bodies..."
Under the influence of primary school Chinese teachers, the author has always had the habit of writing diaries. He often regards Mencius's words as a "motto" and writes them on the homepage of the diary to motivate himself. So my memory is accurate and there will be no mistakes.
Recently, People's Education Press Middle School Chinese Education Editorial Department responded that since Mencius's ancient text was included in the Chinese textbook, the articles in the new and old versions of the textbooks have always been ", so the heaven will give great responsibility, so people... " has never had the ", the people " version.
In order to prove that their memory is not problem, netizens from all over the country have searched and posted various versions of Chinese textbooks. To prove that your memory is right, you are learning "this person".
Some people say this is " Mandela effect ", and the memory that has appeared in several generations has collectively deviated.
The problem is who is right and who is wrong? Someone has found an ancient book, and it is indeed written as ", so html will give great responsibilities in 3 days, so people are..." Could it be that the ancients were also wrong?
According to analysis, it is very likely that the auxiliary textbooks were caused by the problems. From the 1960s to the 1990s, the textbooks across the country were not unified and each province printed them themselves, which was very likely to make mistakes. Anyway, the two mean the same! Is there another possibility that
is that the ancient books are wrong? I'm afraid only Mencius knows the answer to whether it is really a "person" or a "person".
Let’s first look at the meanings expressed by “this person” and “is a person”, both refer to “this person”. So what I mean is that both of these are OK, why do you have to find out whether it is right or wrong?
60, 70, and 80s will read according to their own memories! When encountering difficulties, this is the famous saying of Mencius, ", because heaven will give great responsibilities to this person. You must first exhaust their minds and minds, exhaust their muscles and bones, starve their bodies, and be empty..." to motivate yourself, get out of the trough as soon as possible, and wait for the arrival of the "great responsibilities". You must firmly believe that you can take on a great responsibility.
, the students who are laughing, just read according to the textbook, otherwise they will be deducted points. We can't get more than worth the loss, right?
"This person" and "is human" have nothing to do with each other, but the meaning is the same. We are not full and have nothing to do, so why not let it go? Are you right?
What do you think about this? Did you recite this ancient text "Born in distress and die in peace" when you were in school? Welcome to leave a message in the comment section and tell me if you remember "...this person" or "...this person"?
Good morning everyone! I am " Food and Beauty Diary " First of all, thank you for your effective reading and positive comments. If you like my articles, please follow, like, collect them, and forward them to let more friends see them. Thank you for your support! See you later [handshake]
