Liang Dongfang
Many people like to quote classics and keep quoting, keep saying whoever says, and keep double quotes plus page betting and version indexing. This will make readers feel that the author has extensive knowledge, knowledge and knowledge in a very long history of reading. Before he can see what the author says, he will be respectful first.
If this is not an academic paper, it must be an intentional or unintentional imitation of the academic paper.
If you don’t have nothing to say, it would be a bad habit of following the crowd.
The basis of the bad habit is a very wrong understanding: only by quoting high-end sentences from celebrities can you show that you know more and know more, so that you can write well.
Just ask yourself and its advantages and disadvantages are clear: If you are a reader, would you like to read such so-called articles filled with so-called things that others say! Especially in this era of mobile phone search, you can search almost all the quotations in such articles from your phone effortlessly.
From this we can fully understand that this format of tying up the banner as a tiger skin, this kind of student-centered filling writing style of showing off knowledge is just like that.
What you learn is nothing more than the basis for your life, doing things and writing articles. Knowledge itself is not a creation. Moreover, it is easy to obtain such so-called famous quotes in the mobile phone era. Just enter keywords and search them simply. Even if you quote them, it does not mean that you have mastered this knowledge. Even if you master it, there is no need to repeat the words of your predecessors. The more common situation is that many quotes cannot even remember them yourself afterwards. If you are not sure, you still need to check your phone again.
All knowledge needs to be melted into the self-cognitive system of the world and become one's own flesh and blood veins. Then, starting from such flesh and blood veins, express one's own perception and establish one's own words. This is especially true for literary writing.
Speaking of wild chrysanthemums, someone immediately quoted the famous poem "The evening beauty comes out of the deserted fence, the cold fragrance lies in the autumn water.
I remember seeing the mountains and accompanying the stone wall."
This is indeed a famous quote, but it is also a famous quote after being highly summarized and condensed. poet Wang Jianshan of this poem was mostly used for Wang Jianshan, and Yu chrysanthemums only left such 20 words. This is because at that time, the pen, ink, paper and inkstone were hard-won, and the ink was cherished like gold, and it was also because of the ancient tradition of chanting poems and essays, strictly following the norms of concise and rhythm, and trying to shrink and not overdo.
This kind of unextravagant concise in modern times is actually very irresponsible. In few words, the image is based on these 20 words as clues. The richer ones are only the author's own feelings at that time. If later generations follow it and use such famous quotes as the only expression of the beautiful objects that are always accompanied by year after year in the world, there will be less poetic and picturesque on the scene and personalized self-cognition, and passed on from word to word, and it has been almost dead after generation.
descendants gave up their actual experiences and personalized feelings because of citing classics. They blindly interpreted a certain named thing or emotion in the past. The vitality and aesthetic interest of life will be the same, and there will be no creativity.
Therefore, the essence of citing classics is that it is not enough to express itself because it is difficult for one to learn, so it is necessary to find a shortcut to let the predecessors speak for themselves, and even to raise the banner and be a tiger-skinned person to be a sensationalist. In fact, it is even more lazy. It is an unscrupulous thinking of the historical chapters of the previous people instead of their own real feelings.
All literary masters and relatively mature writers basically do not quote other people's words and sentences. At least you will not use other people's words as the subject of your article, and you will not use other people's words to prove your own words. This is a symbol of the great masters and mature writers as mature writers, and it is also an inevitable condition among the many self-evident readings of high standards.
On the contrary, any beginner or a writer who is less than half a bottle will always quote it in a roundabout way, quoting people who are more famous than themselves, and quoting recognized classics.This is also an important manifestation of their far from achieving higher literary achievements.
When writing articles, those who frequently quote "do" often have too much meaning, and there are too few things that express feelings, act casually, and express their feelings directly. To put it in a good way, it is just a conscientious and conscientious work. It is definitely not passionate or ingenious.
If you see an article and keep saying what others say, the whole article is full of double quotes, you can actually turn it over and put it down directly without reading it. This so-called academic writing only satisfies the author's vanity of creating a large piece of text. Not only did he torture himself, but he also tortures whoever he reads.
Unfortunately, I am a person who works as an editor and a job that is just reading other people's manuscripts. There is no way, I can only suffer such torture often.
