Ms. Tang had a beautiful first love when she was young, but unfortunately she was strongly opposed by her parents and eventually parted ways. Since then, Ms. Tang has never been in love again and is still alone until she is in her 40s.
Because Ms. Tang is flexible and willing to endure hardships, she accumulated tens of millions of property early on. In case of precautions, she kept all of these property in the bank safe. Three years later, Ms. Tang was unfortunately diagnosed with cancer, and it was in the late stage. The doctor said she only had six months at most. Because Ms. Tang had no children and her parents died a few years ago, she decided to distribute all her property to her good friends who took care of her.
She wrote a will under the notarization of the lawyer, listing her friend Mr. Wang as the executor of , and entrusting Mr. Wang to go to the bank to retrieve the things in the safe. Mr. Wang came to the bank and issued a will signed by Ms. Tang to the bank staff, but the bank still refused. The bank explained that there are two ways to open the safe. One is to be present and open the safe after the fingerprint is successfully checked; the other is that after the renter dies, only the heirs or donors confirmed by the statutory procedures are qualified to open the safe. Since Ms. Tang was unable to attend and Mr. Wang was not the heir or the donor, he could not open the safe.
Later, the lawyer thought of a solution and asked Ms. Tang to write a power of attorney and entrust Mr. Wang to take away the property in the safe. Mr. Wang thought this time it was definitely foolproof, but unexpectedly he was rejected by the bank. The reason given was: this power of attorney does not have legal effect and should be notarized at the notary office. In desperation, Mr. Wang had to take the power of attorney to go to the notary office to notarize, but notarization also requires a series of complicated procedures. Before the notarization result was released, Ms. Tang passed away regretfully. In a rage, Mr. Wang sued the bank in court. After careful consideration, the judge believed that the law was nothing more than human favors. Mr. Wang's affairs should be handled specifically, and the bank asked the bank to open the safe for Mr. Wang.
Do you think the judge’s judgment is reasonable? Everyone is welcome to leave a message in the comment area. Friends who like this article should not forget to like and follow it. Thank you for your reading and support!
