Disclaimer: I have no intention to discredit any training institution. Under the "double reduction" policy, it is very difficult for training institutions to survive. What I said is one-sided and does not represent everything. It is limited to the most authentic information I kno

statement: I have no intention to discredit any training institution. Under the " double minus " policy, it is very difficult for training institutions to survive. What I said is one-sided and does not represent everything. It is limited to the most authentic information I know. Tolstoy said: No matter how great a writer is, he is only writing his personal side. I am just a small fish in the sea, so insignificant that I am not worth mentioning.

Most off-campus training institutions on the market are divided into two categories, namely disciplinary and non-disciplinary. After the "double reduction" comes, how many training institutions want to classify themselves as non-disciplinary (mainly training institutions for 0-6 years old). Most of the ones that survive are selling dog meat in sheep's clothing. Of course, various places have little regard for the "double reduction" Policy understanding and implementation vary widely.

The attributes of off-campus training on the market are also divided into two categories, namely directly operated campuses and franchised campuses. There are very few single institutions in the country with more than 100 directly operated campuses, except for some Eastern and Future universities, which have now become products of history. Then the first conclusion comes out, most of them are franchised campuses.

Let’s talk about joining a campus. To join a campus is to join a certain brand. The brand will output the brand name, curriculum system, teacher training and operational support. Since it is a franchised campus, there must be investors. Usually investors = the principal of this campus. When you hear the three words investor, you should think that it is profit-seeking, investment must be rewarded, and everything is based on revenue. for purpose.

Let’s talk about the composition of investors. It can be said with certainty that 80% of investors have never been engaged in the education industry. When they first started doing this, their understanding was only that they saw so many children participating in training. This must be Very profitable. These 80% of investors have all kinds of occupations, including those who sell stereos, some who open fruit tea shops, some who open hotels, some who are fitness instructors, and so on. In short, there is nothing you can’t think of. They know little about education. How do they know that education is about cultivating people with moral integrity, caring sincerely, teaching everyone equally, teaching students in accordance with their aptitude, and achieving practical results? Maybe they will understand it over time.

When a training institution frantically uses marketing methods to gain customers and achieve greater revenue, it means that it is not far from death.

When a training institution tries every means to get you to renew just a few months after your renewal, it means that it is one step closer to death.

When a training institution has frequent changes of teachers and uses various techniques to explain the reasons for the resignation of the new teacher, it means that he is already struggling and wandering on the edge of life and death.

This is also one of the purposes of the country's "double reduction". It exists in disorder, and there are no barriers to entry. Anyone can do it, which is a waste of time. There is no room for sloppiness in education. Quality teaching is a good training institution.