Many people who advocate relaxation believe that the Omickron strain is already very "mild" and the severe disease rate is very low. This is part of the fact, but it is not the basis of "scientific" in their eyes. The current empirical materials have also begun to show that repeated infections will lead to a general decline in immunity and more sequelae problems. After all, the infection is a live virus rather than an inactivated virus. The human body may collapse after repeated strong immunity. Trying to minimize infection is still undoubtedly the best choice.
Many people who advocate relaxation also believe that even poor countries have no medical runs, and hospitals in Europe, America and Japan do not have full beds, which means that the "medical run" will not happen at all. However, this can also be explained. For example, the medical resources of poor countries are concentrated in the upper and middle classes who can afford medical expenses and have commercial insurance, and the poor do not go to hospitals very much; for example, European, American and Japanese hospitals still have empty beds when there are significant excess deaths, which should indicate that the allocation of medical resources is not high and that the hospitals are taking epidemic prevention subsidies, etc. China's medical system resources are not as sufficient as developed countries, but its inclusiveness is done well. In fact, the coverage is still greater than that of countries with the same level as per capita GDP.
Many people who advocate liberalization also believe that the economy will be better if liberalization is released. However, as the world's largest manufacturing country, China's core is still industry, and regardless of the at least a short-term consumption depression that may be caused by a medical run, the shortage of labor in the manufacturing industry will still have a huge impact on production. In fact, data from the United States shows that the rework rate of large cities like New York is only 47%, and the subway traffic remains at 60%-70% before the epidemic. Such data may not be acceptable in the manufacturing system. In fact, the cutting-edge manufacturing industry in the United States has also suffered a significant impact. The delivery speed of F-35 has slowed down and prices have soared. China is likely to be unable to afford the US system at present.
Therefore, people who advocate relaxation often think that they are "scientific", but their argument is just a certain aspect of this complex society and cannot represent all desire thinking. At the same time, some people exposed a flaw in their thinking, that is, they have too many connections with Western thinking, but instead ignore the national conditions of their own country and lose their ability to reflect when the West is in a loss of progress and retreat.
The simple truth is that the country and the people are absolutely united in the face of the epidemic. They are both on the same ship, and the country has no reason to promote things that harm others and are not beneficial to themselves. I personally admire the central government’s highly responsible attitude. Understanding the pressure of “ dynamic zeroing ” is actually much more difficult than it seems.
Of course, at the actual level, we still need to continuously optimize the epidemic prevention system. At present, we can basically control the epidemic through normalization of nucleic acids and cause as little disturbance to the economy as possible. Therefore, as long as this system can be used, dynamic zeroing is still feasible. However, this system is actually very complicated, especially when facing the problem of "both both want and want", many local governments tend to act randomly.
Especially as the epidemic penetrates into small and medium-sized cities and rural areas, the difficulty of governance has increased exponentially. We see that among the first-tier cities, except Shanghai from April to May, all performed well. However, for small and medium-sized cities and rural areas, when facing the epidemic, the government immediately faced the lack of nucleic acid testing capabilities, material support capabilities, qualified epidemiological investigation personnel to determine close contacts, insufficient centralized isolation facilities, and even basic effective sampling. In addition, many local governments lack the motivation to relax the flow of personnel, and other aspects are directly lying flat in addition to a one-size-fits-all blockade.
and some hidden problems may also be exposed. Small and medium-sized cities have single interests and relatively concentrated power, which can easily form huge local interest groups. They may seek more monopoly with the help of "special situations" of epidemic prevention, which is also worth paying attention to. The pressure is very directly transferred to residents on the issue of supply guarantee, and some objective and effective methods for controlling nucleic acid testing in large cities may not be used or cannot be used in these small places.
needs to prevent the epidemic and develop the economy. These are indeed two contradictory requirements, and therefore they test the local governance capabilities. In this process, there are likely to be many places where there are erratic operations. Many conservative bureaucrats will choose a one-size-fits-all approach to avoid risks, not seeking success but seeking no mistakes, which will cause the society to be troubled. However, capable leading cadres often stand out from the spots they cannot see, because no trouble in epidemic prevention is actually success. These are all predictable phenomena.
In terms of the issue of "both both want and want", the governance capabilities of small and medium-sized cities and rural areas are indeed even less insufficient. What is needed now is to seek more supporting solutions and force local governments to truly achieve this "both wanted and want" balance. Continuous optimization and improvement can be carried out between the central and local governments, which also meets the requirements of " self-revolution ". As a public who belongs to the "outside" most of the time, where there is no news, there may be a government with strong governance capabilities. Perhaps this will be an interesting perspective.
