The tree wants to be quiet but the wind does not stop! Against the backdrop of a comprehensive game between China and the United States, the two powerful countries are fighting fiercely in all fields, and the Taiwan Strait, trade, semiconductors... are all dependent on the international pattern of China-US competition. At the same time, another international confrontation with extremely high sensitivity has also seen new trends recently.
Recently, taking advantage of the opportunity of the new UN Human Rights Council , the United States has attracted a number of Western allies such as the United Kingdom, Canada and other Western countries to jointly propose the so-called "debate on the human rights situation in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China", striving to pass the resolution, continue to hype the so-called "Xinjiang human rights issue" fabricated by the United States and the West, smear China's international image, and put China on a "human rights hat".
At around 2 pm local time on the 6th, the No. 20 conference hall of the Palace of Nations in Geneva was packed, and representatives and journalists from all countries attending the meeting were waiting for the release of the voting results. As expected, after the voting results were displayed on the big screen, there was a long-lasting applause in the venue, and many diplomats from countries even stood up to congratulate China. The voting result of
was 19:17. As many as 19 countries voted against, 11 countries chose to abstain, and only 17 countries voted in favor. According to the rules of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations General Assembly, the number of votes in favor must reach more than half of all 47 votes before it can be passed. Therefore, although on the surface, there are only two more countries that vote against the vote than those that vote for the vote, in fact, the United States and the West are still quite far from reaching their own conspiracy.
From the voting results, all those who stand on the side of China symbolizing justice are Asian, African and Latin developing countries, from Sudan , Côte d'Ivoire in Africa, to Indonesian , Pakistan and Nepal in Latin America, and then to Cuba and Venezuela in Latin America. The support of the vast number of third world countries is the basis for China to play an important role in the international stage.
The countries that choose to take the team in the United States are mainly divided into three categories. The first is the Western allies in the standard sense, such as Britain, France, Germany, Japan, , Netherlands , etc.; the second is the US dependent countries, such as South Korea; the third is the Third World countries controlled by the United States, such as Montenegro , Polish , and Somalia , etc.
This shows that although the United States still has a huge influence on the international stage with its only superpower, this international reputation is showing a rapid decline. The US iron ticket warehouse only exists in a small circle of Western countries. For most non-Western countries, especially developing countries, the United States has a greater influence than before, and even its negative image is far greater than its positive image.
Interestingly, in this significant vote, India and Ukraine both abstained, which was unexpected by the United States. In recent years, India and Ukraine have been the focus of winning over the United States and the West. In order to implement the " Indo-Pacific Strategy ", the United States led and established a four-party alliance, and India is an important member of it. Although there has been unhappiness between the United States and India due to the sanctions against Russia, the two countries have obviously cooperated more than differences on anti-China issues. Despite this, India still chooses to be "independent", which is something the United States cannot accept.
Compared with India's ease of bidding abstention, Ukraine's neutrality is not that lightweight. As we all know, the Zelensky administration is a total puppet of the United States at present, and any actions are subject to the instructions of the White House . Under such circumstances, Ukraine can still choose neutrality in voting on human rights issues related to Xinjiang, which is undoubtedly a reflection of China's comprehensive strength.
接7
This draft resolution on Xinjiang-related promotion led by the United States has no novelty in terms of content and is all the so-called "Xinjiang human rights issue" that the West has always hyped. This anti-China farce fabricated by the United States and the West will not deceive most international members with clear understanding except for deceiving themselves.
On the contrary, the United States repeatedly smears China with the "Xinjiang human rights" issue, which only shows that it is deeply trapped in the whirlpool of anti-China and cannot extricate itself.What is even more difficult to understand is that after the draft was rejected, the United States in turn declared "disappointed" in the attitude of the Muslim state and would not give up its position on this issue.
In response to this clumsy anti-China performance presented by the United States and the West on the international stage, the spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded solemnly. First of all, the so-called "Draft Xinjiang Resolution" fabricated by the United States is a completely fictitious political operation, and its fundamental purpose is to use international institutions to realize its own conspiracy to interfere in China's internal affairs. The eyes of the international community are sharp. The choice of most countries, especially Muslim countries, to stand on China's side, fully indicating that the "Xinjiang issue" clamoring by the West is simply unpopular.
As the most important institution in the international community to safeguard human rights, the UN Human Rights Council should truly focus on the escalating human rights disasters around the world, especially the violations of basic human rights by the United States and Western countries, including racial discrimination, gun violence, overseas military operations and indiscriminate killing of innocent people, and give the majority of victims a true justice and give the international community a comprehensive explanation. If you can't even do this and just be willing to act as a "white glove" for political operations in the United States and Britain, it will be the most important blow to the global human rights cause.
