text | Zhang Youhua
Saturday, October 15, 2022, at 2 pm, Taipei City was in storm and rain. After reading the high-end door report of the auditing unit, Director Xu Rongqi, the director of the deep green voter, went to the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office to ring the bell to accuse Chen Shizhong according to the report. The target was not Chen, but to point directly at Tsai Ing-wen, Chen Jianren and others, intending to investigate and deal with Chen Shizhong's negotiation process through judicial units, and Cai Chen played a role.
Xu Rongqi
Xu notice focus: 1. Knowing that the virus will mutate, it relies on vaccines to prevent epidemics, which has led to many people dying for some reason, but the cause of death has not been announced, which is suspected of dereliction of duty. 2. Chen relies on vaccine epidemic prevention and never announces the price of vaccine procurement, and also protects many high-end institutions. Please start an investigation and inform the public of vaccine prices, rather than black box operations, and seal the unit price of vaccine procurement for 30 years. 3. The auditing unit indirectly determines that there is a price difference in vaccine procurement, and the judicial unit should actively investigate the price and check the money flow based on the official report to show credibility. 4. If the price difference gold flow incident involves the government agency’s profit-making manufacturer, judicial units must intervene, thoroughly investigate the direction of the gold flow, and file a public prosecution in accordance with the law.
This document was submitted by the Deep Green people. It is unknown whether the District Prosecutor's Office signed it. However, the reason why the high-end gate incident caused discussion was mainly because 1. None of the representatives of the green camp's public opinion stood up to defend the high-end gate incident and blamed Chen Shizhong for handling. 2. Tsai Ing-wen, Chen Jianren and others continued to hide and did not defend this matter. 3. The DPP did not fight back fiercely, saying that it was the political operation of the Kuomintang and the People's Party, which affected the election situation and made a lawsuit that people were not elected. Its attitude was strange and surprising.
Tsai Ing-wen has never been a gentle, respectful, frugal and concise person, and the DPP is not a moderate party. In order to accumulate criticism, it should have fought back against high-end gate incidents. However, it has been four days since the incident. The DPP did not say anything, which is unusual, showing that once the DPP attacks this matter, Chen Shizhong's election situation will be severely defeated. Therefore, the DPP is silent, which means not to let the situation expand. is like the People's Party Cai Biru's paper incident. The DPP lets go of Cai Biru gently, not because Tsai Ing-wen's conscience discovers, but because she is afraid that public opinion will rebound and hit itself. From this we can see that the DPP is most afraid of the high-end gate incidents. If it strikes back, it will induce a greater political storm, which will make Chen Shizhong's election situation unlimitedly hit the bottom, which will inevitably affect Tsai Ing-wen and others. Can the DPP candidates continue to be elected? uses this to infer that Chen’s election situation is really successful and Tsai Ing-wen is defeated. Who asked Chen Shi-chung to play the role of a pioneer in the high-end gate incident and harm himself in the election battle?
Copyright Statement: This article is an original article from the author, and the image information is from the Internet. Illegal reproduction of the text content of this article is strictly prohibited without authorization. If reprinting or citing is required, the author's consent must be obtained and the source must be indicated.
