"Thinking independently" should be a good word, but it seems to be badly used by many well-known and similar well-known people recently.
I see a lot of public knowledge on the Internet, and I always come to "independent thinking". Some people around me will also use the term when chatting. It feels very hierarchical and thoughtful.
As a layman, he feels that "independent thinking" must have a prerequisite. First of all, should I examine my own cognitive level and whether I have the ability to think about things?
In such a complicated world, how can an ordinary person understand everything and think independently? There may also be such knowledgeable people, I believe they are rare, at least they will not appear in the life circle of laymen like me.
On May 11, 1978, " Guangming Daily " published an article " practice is the only criterion for testing truth ", which triggered the discussion about truth. For me as a layman, to improve the level of cognition can only create opportunities to experience some people or things in a life that is too ordinary to be ordinary, try to keep the distance and try to participate in it, so as to get a little improvement in cognition. .
Some people watch everything coldly, talk about everything, always have their own unique insights, and always feel better than anyone else. I want to ask, why don’t you look in the mirror, weigh yourself up, and have an objective view of yourself Evaluation, then make a high point?
"Think independently" in everything, without those two brushes at your own discretion, a layman among all living beings with no superior opinion, nothing more.
.
