In Darwin 's Bioevolution theory, it is believed that humans evolved from apes, and apes are our human ancestors. Ape evolution humans are mainly divided into three stages: ancient ape stage, half ape half a human stage, and human stage that can produce and manufacture. The latter stage is divided into two stages: ape man and sapiens stage.
Recently, Chinese scientists published 4 academic papers in the international academic journal "Nature ", confirming that humans evolved from fish. After the article was published, it quickly seized the hot searches on major platforms. While netizens were paying attention, they were more confused because it subverted the cognition of many people...
Speaking of the early ape man , the one that everyone is more familiar with is Peking Man . It has been told in middle school textbooks. Peking Man, officially named " Chinese ape man Beijing species", is often called "Beijing Homo erectus pekinensis" in science.
1929, the first skull of Peking Man was found in Zhoukoudian, Fangshan District, southwest of Beijing. Peking Man came to Zhoukoudian about 700,000 years ago and lived in Zhoukou for nearly 500,000 years. About 200,000 years ago, Peking Man left. Peking Man is an important scientific basis for studying the origin of humans in and .
So why is there another person evolving from a fish? Is there any scientific basis? Of course there is an answer. As a scientist, the remarks made are all conducted through research and there is enough evidence to prove its authenticity, not fabricated out of thin air.
published a discussion on the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It is understood that the evolution process from fish to humans takes about 500 million years. First, it experienced the earliest evolution of jawless , becoming jawless and meat-finned fish, and then it climbed from the water to land and turned into amphibians and mammals, and finally evolved into humans.
When it comes to this, many friends don’t buy it. According to most people, the difference between fish and humans is too big. One lives in water, the other lives on land, one has hands and feet, and the other has only fin . It is impossible to be a species no matter how you look at it.
netizens also raised many questions about this. Some netizens said: If this proves that humans evolved from fish, then should we overturn Darwin's argument? What we learned before was that people who evolved from ape have become fish, but now they have become fish. Can they still eat fish in the future?
Some netizens retorted: Humans evolved from apes or fish, which is not valid at all. If so, then there are fish and apes on the earth now. Why have you never seen their evolution? For example, half-apocalypse or half-evolved fish?
To be honest, although this is a scientist's theory, the editor, like many netizens, is a little confused about the east, south, west and north. According to Darwin's argument, humans evolved as apes, which is close to logic, because apes and humans are similar in their living environment, regardless of whether they are constructed from the body, but there is too much difference between fish and humans, and it is impossible to connect the two together.
As netizens said, as a person who likes fishing and likes to eat fish, if a person really evolves from fish, wouldn’t he become a sinner? Not to mention how much he has eaten before and caught it, what should he do in the future? Whether to eat this fish or not, eating a fish is like eating one's own ancestors, and the same is true for fishing. How can we get this mouthful!
I wonder if you agree with scientists’ arguments. Do you accept the evolution of apes or will you accept the evolution of fish? Everyone is welcome to comment and express their opinions, otherwise they will never be able to eat fish or fish in the future.
I am the fisherman Mumu Ge, thank you for your support!
