requires severe punishment for hijacking money and killing life Lao Rongzhi and be responsible for the innocent seven lives that died. This is the most correct thing. Judging from the verdict in the first and second instances, it is also such an inevitable result that has been expected. No matter how many possibilities and speculations are, it is actually meaningless.
Most people's understanding and judgment are very simple. Through the public information obtained, they believe that Lao and Law are together, cooperate with each other, and each perform their duties. For the sake of money, they kill several lives. Both of them must be responsible for the things they committed. Thus, they conclude that Lao Rongzhi and Fa Ziying are both masterminds, and both deserve to die. Although Fa Ziying has long been sentenced, Lao Rongzhi should also follow Fa Ziying. What's more, it is said that Fa Ziying did not kill people when he was not with Lao Rongzhi, and only killed people after he was together. Lao Rongzhi is the culprit, and he is the real person with great sins.
Under the control of this kind of thinking, all lawyers who defend Lao Rongzhi are bad people, people with no sense of justice, all for money and to become famous. Anyone who believes that there should be a certain evidence and legal procedures for trial is considered to be equally unsympathetic. Why not consider it from the perspective of the victim? What would it be if the victim was his own relative or friend? For such an obvious thing, there are people who actually speak for Lao, and it may even be a navy army who came out to speak nice things for Lao Rongzhi and concluded that she was to exonerate her guilt. Is the idea of
correct? It's so correct, absolutely ten thousand correct. Just imagine, I have conspired to kill seven lives in more than three years. During the 20 years of escape, I lived a free and easy life. After being caught, I dared to push them all to the dead Fa Ziying. I was arrogant and quibbling, without sincerely admitting guilt and repenting my sins to seek happiness. This is simply the leader of all evil. When I see her eyes, I feel full of sin. When I see her smile, I feel that there are such evil people in this world. In short, my whole body, my every move, my words and actions are full of sin. I am a full female devil and a femme fatale.
Why do we feel this way? It is because we have been looking and judging her with guilty eyes and guilty ideas, and came to the conclusion we think we are extremely correct. We are happy to punish her, and we wish that those who deserve sin will be punished earlier. One day later, the air in this world will not be so clean.
In fact, we don’t have to pay attention to this least important result. Punishment for crimes and punishment is a matter of course, and it is a judgment that must be made by solemn law. If we blindly focus on condemning the crimes committed by labor and demand severe punishment by the public, it is actually a waste of our time, because it is indeed not the most important thing for us general public.
There is a law to follow, there is a law to follow, the law must be strictly enforced, and violations must be punished are the basic requirements of the socialist legal system. If we only see that Lao Rongzhi, who is even guilty of the extreme, have lawyers to defend, but do not realize that this is actually a right and guarantee that everyone should have; if we only see that someone says that there must be a certain evidence and legal procedures to trial Lao Rongzhi, but do not realize that one day, maybe she will become her party?
sentence Lao Rongzhi to one death penalty. Is ten death penalty important? In fact, it really doesn't matter. What is really important is that as long as the evidence is conclusive and the procedures are legal, there is no problem in sentenceing 100 death penalty, because the legal requirements are that everyone must abide by and violations are pursued.
Abide by laws and regulations, everyone is responsible. Doesn’t this everyone include everyone?
