Sima Nan is quite popular on the Internet. Every news of him has a volume of likes of tens of thousands, and every view of him is praised and praised by people .
Since he condemned Lenovo online and confronted Liu Chuanzhi head-on, he seemed to be transformed into 's messenger , and became the spokesperson for against capital and unreasonable situations.
He has criticized Mo Yan and criticized Yang Jiang until he transferred the object of criticism to those who "tell the story of China and Russia", saying that these people should be "killed without any consideration". The remarks of aroused the indignation of netizens. Sima Nan suddenly "turned over" and all kinds of bad comments came one after another.
In fact, Sima Nan is a controversial person, some supportive and some ridicule, , but for the first time there was such a large-scale confrontation. Sima Nan may really need to reflect on himself.
Some netizens angrily denounced Sima Nan as an old traitor.
The word traitor is undoubtedly a derogatory term, pointing to the traitors and people from the country.
People who have complained about Sima Nan believe that Sima Nan was a critic on the moral high ground in peacetime, and in wartime, he was a naked traitor.
Traitors are usually two-faced people, one in front of others and one behind them.
Traitors are fencemen, so they pour wherever they blow the wind. They do not care about the facts, have no real opinions, and will not have the belief to stand firm. They only have interests in their hearts. is good for you, and betraying your promise you once promised is common.
Netizens used all the ugly words about Sima Nan and said that he "didn't even want his face for the sake of traffic."
implicitly, in order to gain traffic and attention, Sima Nan has no bottom line to ride on the popularity, regardless of his conscience comments and speeches. When he criticized Mo Yan and Yang Jiang, some people said that Sima Nan would take advantage of whoever was popular.
Someone commented on Sima Nan, "A single sentence killing is completely exposed the chuck's ulterior motive ambition."
The word "kill without refusal" is too intense. In an era where peace and development are the main themes, it is inappropriate to use this word on any occasion, and it will also give people an invisible sense of oppression. The word
is too resentful, and it is indeed terrifying to promote this kind of thinking towards compatriots living in the same hot land.
Someone else said, "I have long discovered that this guy has a problem. This guy is the main organizer of anti-humanity."
The word "anti-human" is a bit serious. Sima Nan is a contradictory group, and what he says and what he does are against each other. What he criticized is what he had done or was practicing.
But one code is the same as one code. He should not have reached the height of anti-humanity, he is just making a living.
Some netizens also said that he was doing "patriotic business". Everyone understands this meaning, and it seems that Sima Nan is not the only one who is doing "patriotic business".
or above is a one-sided statement from netizens, which is their personal opinion of Sima Nan.
Since he said the word "kill without any reason", it has indeed aroused the extreme disgust of many people, and "falling out" is truly worthy of its reputation.
Sima Nan has come to this day, and I have to admire his intelligence. Sima Nan is indeed talented and good at grasping the trend.
When the wave of self-media came, he transformed from a traditional "anti-counterfeiting fighter" to a self-media practitioner, and was well versed in the success of self-media. With his outstanding eloquence, under the strong competitive situation of self-media practitioners "crossing a single-plank bridge", he stood out, had tens of millions of fans, and had multiple accounts, making a fortune.
Sima Nan and Hu Xijin are practitioners of the same profession and make a living by commenting on hot events and hot people. This is their "trump card" to support their family. The hot spots appeared, and Sima Nan showed his skills. He enjoyed it and liked to show up online.
Even though he had been banned from the entire network for several days a while ago, after the account permissions were restored, he was still active and frequently expressed his opinions on the Internet.
I can understand Sima Nan, but it is difficult to really support him. This is my true thought in my heart, and I can't deceive myself. I think many people think so too, because our instinct will dislike people who are different in words and deeds and are profit-oriented.
He once criticized " Beautiful National " and criticized the phenomenon of making money at home and spending abroad. However, he was "spoofed" by his relatives and bought a house abroad. His wife and children studied and lived abroad, and worked hard to make money abroad.
Sima Nan's actual situation is the object of his condemnation with great fanfare on the Internet. How did Sima Nan convince himself to fall asleep peacefully when the contradiction is late at night?
He always condemned people who were pro-Japanese and pro-American, but the reality is that he once strongly praised Japanese , happily wearing kimono, taking photos with foreigners of different skin colors, and making great joy.
He once criticized Lenovo for having problems and even criticized Lenovo with real name. continues to launch public opinion offensives online, provoke online disputes, establish opposition, stimulate netizens' adrenaline, and waste online resources.
A person who really does practical things will directly hand over the evidence of the association right and wrong in his hands and hand it over to legal means to solve it. Launching a verbal debate online with the intention to guide public opinion is a blasphemy against the law.
These contrasts before and after appearing on a person at the same time. I can't convince myself to believe in this person. I feel that such a person is full of unpredictable terribleness. It’s like a person smiling at you, praising you in front of you, turning his face with a fierce expression, and speaking ill with harsh words behind you.
Comments need to be conscience and kindness, rationality and thinking. You cannot only have a position, no personal opinion, and you cannot think about getting along with everything.
Sima Nan is not lacking in rationality and is good at thinking, but it seems that he lacks a little sincerity and has more cater and hostility.
