Perhaps in people's impression, the relationship between the West and Russia is very tense, and the entire West is unanimously aimed at Russia! The two sides are fighting in almost all areas, but it is a bit surprising that the Western definition of this kind of confrontation does not seem to be hostile, it is just a screaming competition, and the relationship is positioned as an opponent. The talk turned out to be only the so-called containment, not a strict enemy, at least a little bit of meaning. Now whether NATO or the European Union has become the focus of containment of Russia, there is no big spit on the topic of war against Russia.
Meeting to restore Russia’s status as a member of the European Commission
This is not a media statement, but a conclusion of the NATO meeting. The NATO Secretary-General said that EU member states “approve of containing Russia”, but it is important not to give up dialogue. Although there is nothing friendly to Russia, it is proposed: "We are adjusting deterrence capabilities to respond to Russia's destabilizing actions." It requires that "members are committed to building a better arms control structure," but it also clearly stated, "We are all Agreed that efforts should be made to engage in dialogue with Russia."
The western camp
clearly opposes the so-called enemy's statement regarding the future of the relationship between the two sides, but only emphasizes, "We welcome progress-oriented dialogue between the United States and Russia. There should be no limitless talk The existence of agreements on the number of nuclear warheads.” In other words, they advocate dialogue with Russia and oppose a nuclear arms race.
Russian Army
If people learn more about it, they can know that now the West and Russia have no enmity! Since the Cold War, the two sides have not had any frontal military conflicts or conflicting disputes. In essence, there is no contradiction that cannot be reconciled.
In a sense, the West and Russia are in a conflict of interests, or in order to establish an enemy to establish an enemy, so we can see NATO's accusations against Russia, the so-called: "Russia regularly conducts military intimidation operations near the NATO border." It is believed that “Russian activities in the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea, the Atlantic Ocean and the Eastern Mediterranean have affected the security of the European Atlantic region.” This is a hollow accusation, a bit of a real accusation that Russia’s so-called "aggression" against Ukraine and Georgia, but none of them belong to NATO member.
What are the benefits of fighting the Russian army?
Now the two sides have no intention to break out of conflict. In terms of performance, no one is ready. In fact, no one has this intention. In terms of specific conditions, Western countries have restored Russia’s status as a member of the European Commission. It was in June 2019 that the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe passed a resolution to restore the status of Russia's membership, which made Ukraine furious, but there was no way.
Ukraine also did not regard Russia as an enemy
NATO, on the surface, was anti-Russian, shouting: "By 2030, Russia is likely to remain the main military threat to the North Atlantic Alliance." However, the specific action became: "Containment" and encourage continuation. Negotiations on peaceful coexistence and a positive response to "constructive changes" in Russia’s position are the essence of the struggle between the two sides. It is only competition, not an enemy. There is no possibility of conflict. Both sides play superficial skills. In other words: bluffing.
