If you want to talk about the relationship between the United States and Israel, it can always be said to be very harmonious, and this harmony has almost reached the level of favoritism. However, with the easy-going US withdrawal from the Middle East, the US-Israeli relations also seem to have become absent. To some extent, fluctuations in U.S.-Israeli relations mean that the situation in the Middle East may change again.

First thing: The United States warns Israel that the situation in the Middle East has changed!
December 6, according to domestic media citing AFP , U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken html on the 24th warned that the United States would oppose the next Israeli government's establishment of new settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Blinken said that we will continue to explicitly oppose any actions that threaten the two countries' solutions, , especially the expansion of settlements, measures to annex the West Bank, the destruction of the historical status of the holy land, the demolition and expulsion and the incitement of violence. .
To be honest, Israel has repeatedly encroached on the Palestinian 's territories Turkey, we have never seen such a clear warning from the United States before. This time, the United States warned Israel by name. Obviously, there must be a reason.
From the attitude of the Americans, at least one thing is to prove that the United States is giving the term-designated Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu vaccination, and the United States does not allow the situation in Israeli-Palestinian situation to be turbulent.
Why did the United States get this vaccination? Of course, it is because Netanyahu is the proxy. The radicals on the table are very likely to continue to erode the Palestinian territory after taking office.

If there is another conflict between Pakistan and Israel, the situation in the Middle East will inevitably be turbulent. In fact, since the founding of Israel, there have been five conflicts around Palestinian conflicts in total, and each time the United States is standing behind Israel and competing with Arab countries.
It is obvious that Israel The contradiction with Palestine is not just a contradiction between the two countries, but a contradiction between Israel and the entire Arab country. In the context of the United States withdrawing from the Middle East and transferring military qualifications to the Indo-Pacific, how much effort does the United States have to stabilize the situation in the Middle East?
Now the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is not over yet. The United States is staring at China. If something happens in the Middle East, the United States will inevitably stand for Israel, and this will put the United States in the opposite direction with Arab countries.
Iran in the Middle East Although Lang and Saudi do not deal with each other, their position on Israel is consistent. If Arab countries are united because of opposition to Israel, will the United States still have room to do it?
The Middle East is the main oil-producing region in the world and the foundation of the US dollar. If the Middle East abandons the settlement of the US dollar or continues to announce oil production cuts, this may be huge for the conflict in the United States.
This time, Blinken warned Israel, which is also the Greece. I hope Israel will calm down. If there is a problem in the Middle East, the foundation of the United States' empire may collapse.

The second thing: What is the abacus of Ukraine? Attacking Russian local targets!
htmlOn December 5, the Russian Ministry of Defense issued a statement saying that Ukraine used jet drones that morning to target located in Ryazan Prefecture and Saratov Prefecture. The Russian military airport launched an attack, causing casualties to Russian soldiers.
Russia said that three Russian soldiers were killed and four others were injured during the attack. In addition, due to the fall of the Ukrainian drone above the military airport , the bodies of the two Russian fighters were damaged.
What is unexpected is that after the attack accident, Ukraine did not dodge, but admitted that it was Ukraine did.
After Ukraine attacked Russian targets, the Russian army was very angry and immediately launched a retaliatory strike against Ukraine.
attacked Russian targets. Why did Ukraine do this? According to Russia, if Russia is invaded, Russia will use all means including nuclear weapon to attack.
Ukraine does this, probably not by chance.Judging from the current situation in Russia and Ukraine, Ukraine may have at least three intentions. First, Ukraine wants to escalate the conflict and use Ukraine's strike capabilities. Without the technical support of the United States, Ukraine will not be able to do this. Ukraine obviously has the intention to pull the United States into the water.

Secondly, Ukraine expressed dissatisfaction with the United States' pressure on peace talks, and expressed dissatisfaction with the US's attitude of only supporting the recovery of territory since February 24, rather than Crimea . This shows that Ukraine embodies its will to regain all territories.
Third, Ukraine's actions are probably intentional to humiliate Russia and further crack down on Russia's morale and people's hearts. When all Russia can be hit, the confidence of the people in the country will have a great impact on Russia's prestige.
Russia is angry after Ukraine carried out such a blow. However, Ukraine is not afraid of Russia's revenge, and even "welcomes" Russia's revenge.
The more revenge Russia retaliates, the more Ukraine becomes, the more people join the army. Moreover, Ukraine's personnel training and equipment are all based on NATO , and it does not require domestic provisions from Ukraine. Russia's missile strikes targets in Ukraine and will not weaken the Ukrainian army's vitality.
Now that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has reached this situation, Russia is indeed a bit passive. It is easy to start a war, but difficult to end. I'm afraid that Russia will also have to spend a lot of effort to end this conflict.

The third thing: riots occurred in Mongolia, why did Mongolia do this?
On December 6, according to domestic media reports, thousands of people held a demonstration at Sukhbaatar Square in the center of Ulaanbaatar that day, trying to attack the government building " National Palace ", demanding the punishment of corrupt officials and the dissolution of the Mongolian Parliament.
Protesters believe lawmakers related to the coal industry have "stealed" billions of dollars in coal gains, which has also sparked public anger.
Mongolia official Mengtong News Agency reported that the riots caused by the march had subsided on the same day. Mongolian State Great Khular (Parliament) held a plenary meeting, but decided that there is no need to implement a state of emergency at present.
Riots occurred in Mongolia, which is indeed a bit unexpected. In fact, Mongolia's anti-corruption agency announced in mid-last month that more than 30 officials, including the chief officer of the state-owned coal mine company Jenta Bon Tauregee, were under investigation for corruption.
Logically speaking, if corrupt officials are investigated, public grievances should not occur, and public grievances will not cause impact on state organs.

And it is incredible that two hours before the riot, the US Embassy in Mongolia accurately "predicted" the riot and issued an alarm in advance!
On the one hand, the US Embassy can predict riots, and on the other hand, protests trigger incidents that impact state organs. No matter which perspective we look at it, it seems like someone has used a certain social sentiment to "plan".
Mongolia has corruption problems, which is certain. Does anyone want to take advantage of the troubled waters? I'm afraid there are, too.
takes advantage of social contradictions around the world, engage in color revolutions, and strengthen control. This is a common method used by the United States. The United States is probably adding fuel to such an incident in Mongolia, and it is inseparable from it.
Fortunately, Mongolia quickly calmed down this riot. Mongolia cannot be in chaos. Against the backdrop of increasingly close cooperation between China and Mongolia and Russia, a stable Mongolia is undoubtedly crucial.
(End of this article)
Statement: The picture is from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it!