Crimea Bridge is obviously Russia's "reverse scale", so Kiev was bombed by missile as expected. After a large number of missiles "scrubbed the ground" against Ukrainian cities, the Russian army announced that all the strike plans carried out on that day had been completed. This time, the Russian army successfully destroyed Ukraine's communications, energy and command facilities, which had a serious impact on Ukrainian operations and the normal operation of society, but is this enough? Russia claims that all strikes have been achieved, so does this mean that the retaliation has ended?
If this is true, the Russian army's revenge will once again fall into a "head-and-head" situation, because such revenge is not enough to shock the Ukrainian army and prevent it from continuing to attack the Crimea Bridge, and it is not in line with the so-called "Judgement Day". Although the bridge has not been completely destroyed, the Russian army should have taught Ukraine a lesson in a series of recent events. Fortunately, it did not disappoint. Until now, explosions are still occurring in many places in Ukraine. Although the lives and safety of the Ukrainian people have been affected, this is war after all.
It is reported that the bombing has caused hundreds of casualties in Ukraine. In the past, the Russian army would definitely have some concerns about this, but the situation has long been different. Since the retreat of Kharkov, the Russian army has relaxed restrictions and is no longer afraid of things. This comprehensive strike is very effective, but it still exposes many problems with the Russian army, that is, the poor missile accuracy. During the first wave of explosions, missiles landed 1,000 meters away from the Ukrainian President's office, and there were parks and playground facilities, which obviously would not be the target of the Russian army. The Russian army will not use attacking civilian facilities to warn Ukraine, so this is very likely due to insufficient missile accuracy.
deviation reaches 1,000 meters. Not to mention cruise missile , even ordinary ballistic missile , rarely such a large deviation occurs. The lack of missile accuracy will affect the strike effect. What's even more exaggerated is that more than 50% of missiles were intercepted by the Ukrainian army. According to Ukraine, the Russian army launched a total of 75 missiles, but 41 of them were intercepted. If this is true, the Russian army's strike did not actually achieve the expected results. But the Russian side said that the plan has been completed, who is lying? Although the Russian army's attack was insufficient, it is doubtful that the Ukrainian army can achieve such a high interception rate.
You should know that most of Ukrainian air defense system were paralyzed by the Russian army. Currently, there is only a portable air defense system, and it is difficult to shoot down incoming missiles on a large scale. Unless it has obtained the US NASAMS system, it will not be able to do this at all. The Russian army is still bombing Ukraine, so I believe that the answer will be drawn soon. In the editor's opinion, it doesn't matter who has a more credible battle report, but what's more important is how to cool down the situation.
(text/Xile)
