Recently, Russia's retaliatory continuous long-range attacks on Ukraine once again provoked the sensitive nerves of Europe. NATO began to render the " nuclear war clouds".
According to Global Network , a senior NATO official who participated in the meeting of the NATO nuclear planning group said that if Russia launches an nuclear strike against Ukraine, will trigger a counterattack from Ukraine's allies, including NATO.
Almost at the same time, Borrell, the senior representative of EU diplomacy and security policy, also said that the West will make a strong "military response" to Russia's use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine, but does not include the same use of nuclear means.
Compared with Europe's bluff, the United States quickly began to implement specific actions. According to the Russian Satellite News Agency, the United States has released a new version of its national security strategy, which mentioned that the United States will transform its own nuclear power in order to reduce the risk of nuclear war and maintain its nuclear deterrence capabilities.
will upgrade nuclear military forces including "Trial" nuclear strikes, nuclear command, and basic nuclear facilities. Also in this new version of national security strategy, The United States once again reiterated that it "does not seek conflict or a new Cold War."
In order to reduce the risk of nuclear war, it strengthens its nuclear military power, does not seek a new Cold War, but continues to win over and establish military alliances to encircle other major powers. The "American-style double standards" are really well-deserved. It can be seen that directly taking Ukraine's possible nuclear strike as a prerequisite, the United States and Europe are sacrificing other countries to expand their own strength under the hypocritical inner self and wolf ambitions of sacrificing other countries.
First of all, will Russia attack Ukraine nuclear? This is the focus of current European and American renderings. The answer is that it would never be before, and it seems that it would not be true either at present.
A major turning point here is that Russia merged the four Ukrainian prefectures through a referendum. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov was asked before, "whether nuclear weapons will be used to defend the four Ukrainian prefectures", he also stated that "all Russian territory will be fully protected."
This clearly tells Ukraine and the West that the Ukrainian army's attack on Khlsong , Zaporoze , Donetsk and Lugansk will be regarded as an invasion by Russia, so the West uses this as a breakthrough to exaggerate Russia's "motive to launch a nuclear war."
But what about the fact? Anyone with discerning eyes knows that the reason why Russia initiated a referendum to promote the four regions to join Russian territory as soon as possible is to not only cope with complex situations and consolidate the results as soon as possible, but also to allow some mobilized conscripts to enter Ukraine to fight, making up for the current lack of military strength.
You can say that this is Russia's new strategic layout to change the situation in Russia and Ukraine, and you can also say that it is a stopgap measure taken by Russia to maintain the front line and expand its troops. The whole world knows that as of the current situation, Kiev has finally gained some advantage and will definitely continue to maintain the offensive. Russia itself also knows that the Ukrainian army will never be blocked by a referendum on the west bank of the Dnieper River.
Therefore, reverses the situation as soon as possible, regains the initiative, and restores the advantageous offensive position. Russian military-industrial enterprise has partially entered the wartime production state, working overtime to produce weapons and various military equipment. This shows that the Russian army will still turn the situation around through large-scale ground wars in the future, and will not even expect saturated air strikes that will break through the can, let alone use nuclear weapons.
Therefore, the United States and Europe wantonly exaggerate the threat of Russian nuclear war, giving Zelensky platform is fake, and expanding the army and expanding the military threat to Russia is real.
Europeans say that they will not use nuclear means to counter Russia in the future because compared with the Russian nuclear force and the "Trial-in-One" strike system, the EU's "property" is not enough to look at . Even if the nuclear force is strengthened, it can only add muscle to France, but now France obviously does not want to get involved.
So under the promotion of the EU and NATO, many European countries have launched conventional military expansion plans. Germany said it will set up a division with 15,000 soldiers in the long run. NATO has decided to expand its joint combat forces from 40,000 to 300,000.The Polish , which is closer to Russia, directly launched a large-scale military purchase mode, purchasing nearly a thousand advanced k2 main battle tanks and 600 self-propelled artillery from South Korea.
We always say that Russia has the huge ground military force left by the Soviet Union that can sweep Europe, but in fact, through the Russian-Ukraine war, everyone can see that in terms of conventional military power, the EU has a scale and technological advantage over Russia, and NATO has an overwhelming military advantage over Russia.
The so-called resistance to threats and safeguarding national security by the EU and NATO are all fake, and expanding their own deterrence is the ultimate goal. The EU expands its conventional military strength, and the United States, which has no worries, directly began to upgrade its nuclear power. Russia had tested the latest Salmatt intercontinental missile with a range of more than 18,000 kilometers. Europe watched the fun, but the United States was really stimulated.
In the view of the United States, China and Russia have steadily dominated and are getting faster and faster in the development of land-based intercontinental missiles. The United States no longer expects to rely on the advanced but limited size Trident D-5 and the old militia-3 to maintain its long-range nuclear strike advantage. The first flight of its latest GBSD next-generation land-based intercontinental missile development has been on the agenda.
US these actions mean that in the military, after the complete return of the advanced combat system from the past anti-terrorism special warfare, the United States is planning to provoke a new round of advanced technology-oriented arms race. But in the final analysis, no matter what abacus the United States and Europe are behind the scenes, the means of using nuclear threats to to restrict and slander Russia will eventually fail. Ukraine should not expect that Europe and the United States will really come to save itself. It just hopes that both sides will still retain a slight opportunity for peace in the end.
