The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is intensifying, and the confrontation between the two sides is also escalating. Especially after the explosion of on the Crimea Bridge and the Russian army bombed nine areas including Kiev , it means that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is likely to evolve into a "declaration of war."
Don’t forget, Russia has issued a warning before that any attack on the Crimean Bridge can be regarded as an "invasion". Now it seems that Russia really did what it said, and before this bombing, the Russian army had just appointed Surovikin as the commander-in-chief of the Russian army's special military operations against Ukraine. In other words, this is the "first fire of the three fires" that the new Russian military officer took office. However, it is reported that the former deputy chief of staff of the United States threatened that the United States only used only $66 billion to obtain a Ukraine that is dying with Russia.
Because since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has provided aid to Ukraine of 66 billion US dollars. So what did the United States get after spending $66 billion? Of course, I got a very satisfactory result.
After all, in the eyes of the United States, the Ukrainian soldiers who died on the front line are now sent to death, not American soldiers. What's more, the US's arms aid to Ukraine are not the most advanced and high-end weapons, but stock weapons. As for the so-called $66 billion, it is just nominal funds, and a large part of the funds flowed into the pockets of the US military-industrial complex from the hands of the US Congress.
In addition, this person also believes that the United States once deduced that if it directly fought with Russia, the United States would eventually need to invest 6 trillion US dollars. Now that I only spent 66 billion US dollars, I got a satisfactory result. Why not do it? Don’t forget that the United States’ direct and indirect actions are both for the same goal, which is to weaken the overall strength of the Russian army.
Now it seems that the United States has achieved this goal with US$66 billion, which is equivalent to only 1% of the total budget, so it makes Ukrainians scream and rush towards the Russian soldiers one after another. So, in the eyes of the United States, it is really cost-effective to use US$66 billion to weaken the Russian military. In other words, Americans really don’t do business that loses money. Unfortunately, Ukraine just can't understand this and would rather take the risk of "destroying the party and the country" than confronting Russia to the end. The final outcome of
may really be the case where Ukraine confronts the last person. In other words, Ukrainian soldiers are destined to die in vain. Once Ukraine loses its ability to defend its territorial sovereignty, you can imagine whether there will be Ukraine on the territory of Europe?
can only be said about this, the United States once again fully demonstrated the "dead fellow Taoists who die but do not die". It can even be said that as long as the American soldiers who died on the front line are not the ones who died, Pentagon will be extremely happy. After all, what does the life and death of the Ukrainians have to do with the United States? Even if Ukraine "destroys the country" because of this, it is probably in the eyes of the United States that Ukraine is just not as skilled as humans. As for the territory of Europe, is there still Ukraine? It is also not a question that the United States should be concerned about. In this regard, I also advise Ukraine that it is time to wake up. Instead of being a humble "dog", it is better to choose to be a dignified person.
