In recent times, there has been a very unpleasant situation between Swedish and EU for a time, focusing on the investigation of the leakage of natural gas pipelines of Nord Stream No. 1 and 2. A few days ago, the European judicial organization suggested that Germany and Denmark set up a joint investigation team to investigate the leakage of natural gas pipelines.
According to the agreement, if the joint investigation team intervenes in the investigation, Sweden, the leading country of the investigation, must share internal investigation information, even if the information is listed as confidential.
However, on the 14th local time, Sweden, which had conducted nearly 20 days of investigation into the Nord Stream pipeline, announced that it was too sensitive to share the investigation results with EU countries and kept the joint investigation teams of Germany and Denmark away.
After Sweden refused to intervene in the investigation team, Denmark also dismissed its plan to set up a joint investigation team. The current situation is that the three countries are fighting independently and independently investigating the leakage incident in the Nord Stream pipeline, which also means that the day when the official reveals the truth may be further and further away.
In fact, this is not the first time that the Swedish government has refused to participate in the investigation. As early as a week ago, Russia wrote a letter to the Swedish government, asking the Russian government and Russian gas companies to participate in the investigation. However, Swedish Prime Minister Anderson said he refused to share the investigation results with Russia. NATO state monopolizes the investigation power of the Nord Stream pipeline, which has raised the entire incident to the height of the geopolitical problem.
We all know that after the explosion of the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, there have always been two completely different statements about the perpetrators. If we follow Western public opinion, the perpetrator must be Russia, because Russia wants to make the matter bigger, making the European energy crisis more serious, and causing the effect of shaping Western countries.
But from the perspective of the greatest benefit, the perpetrator is more likely to be the United States. Because the Nord Stream pipeline was blown up, there is no possibility of reopening energy cooperation between Europe and Russia in the short term. The EU will bow to the US's energy supply, and the US can also increase its harvest of the EU. At the same time, the United States can also deeply bind the EU and maintain a war of attrition with Russia during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
From this perspective, Sweden's statement is very interesting. It seems that he has said nothing, but he has said everything.
We all know that Sweden and Finland only joined NATO a few months ago, and joining NATO must be consistent with the United States to a certain extent.
Although Sweden is not as extremely anti-Russia as Poland and Lithuanian , it will jump on everything about Russia, but as an ally of the United States, Sweden's position on Russia is in sync with the Western group. If the investigation results are really done by Russia, will Sweden keep it tightly and be secretly announced? Of course it is impossible for
. If NATO discovers the connection between the Nord Stream pipeline leak and Russia, even a little bit, it will definitely be hyped up as big news.
Some time ago, the American media forced the pace without any evidence and made Russia the real culprit behind the scenes. If Russia really destroyed the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, how could NATO give up?
For the West, this is proof that Russia does not comply with commercial contracts and is the worst partner. The West will definitely use this incident to discredit Russia into the public enemy of the world.
But now, the investigation has been almost done, but the Swedish government is unwilling to reveal any results. The Western media is silent again. What does this mean?
