I really can’t believe that the famous mainstream media in the United States, the New York Times, actually published a heavyweight article on its front page saying that China is not the great enemy of the United States.

I really can’t believe that the famous American mainstream media "The New York Times" actually published a heavyweight article on the front page saying that China is not the great enemy of the United States.

1. This article published by the New York Times on May 31 believes that China and the United States seem to be very "hostile", but even so, the two countries still maintain very close diplomatic, trade and other relations. This shows that the relationship between China and the United States is very important.

The United States should cultivate, not jeopardize, these relationships, which are critical for both countries to maintain prosperity, stability, and security.

The United States should not let our antipathy towards China’s domestic system become the basis for our interactions with this country, which is second only to us in the global system.

2. This article stated that in a speech last Thursday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken revealed the long-awaited official stance of the Biden administration on China.

Blinken said that China, not Russia led by Vladimir Putin, represents the strongest and most determined "threat" to the world order advocated by the United States.

Blinken said that China "is the only country that not only has the intention to reshape the international order" but also has the ability to do so. The United States will seek to join forces with other countries to meet Beijing's challenge.

In response to Blinken's speech, the "New York Times" believes that there is no doubt that this country is a more powerful potential opponent than Russia in terms of military, economic and ideological aspects.

3. This article points out that the United States must have a clear understanding of China.

Although China’s military expenditure is second only to the United States, its purpose is to “counter” the United States’ military superiority in East Asia. China's rising nationalism is reflected in its beliefs that Taiwan must be reunited with mainland China and that the South China Sea is China's internal sea.

This article believes that these problems do not necessarily make China a threat to the prosperity and security of the United States. It is logical for an emerging power like China to develop defense plans that include the possibility of potential conflict with the United States.

China’s rhetoric on the Taiwan issue has never gone beyond the scope of “military intimidation,” which appears to be even more restrained compared with the United States’ historical approach to Latin America.

4. The article believes that the United States cannot regard China’s modest demands as a threat.

China has always been willing to engage in a policy of engagement with the United States and has shown a good willingness to cooperate. And the United States should be clear that it has never regarded human rights as the basis of its entire foreign policy. In fact, the United States should not do so. If the United States does so, it will bring endless intervention and global conflicts. Basing policy on what might happen is equally dangerous, and the United States cannot make the mistake of assuming that any country that does not abide by "liberal democratic" norms is a new threat to the United States. What's more, the economic and trade relations between China and the United States are extremely close. China holds US$1 trillion in US national debt.

5. Author's comments:

After reading the main content of this article, I was deeply surprised that there are still people in the United States who are so clear-headed and rational about Sino-US relations. The main point of this article is almost the same as the Chinese government’s positioning on Sino-US relations. I even doubt whether this article was written by a Chinese “agent”.

Over the years, how to position the relationship between China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, has always been a key point in determining the direction of the world today.

There has always been a big difference in the positioning of China and the United States. Generally speaking, China is more rational, objective, and calm, while the United States is more extreme, subjective, and manic.

China has always emphasized that China is rising peacefully and has no intention of replacing the United States as the world leader. China is willing to fully cooperate with the United States to jointly contribute to the progress and development of mankind and become a force for peace in the world.

However, the United States has never believed that China can rise peacefully. It's always "Use the heart of a villain to judge the intentions of a gentleman" .Because the United States believes in the law of the jungle. Historically, the second child always kills the boss through force and becomes the new boss. This is how America became the boss and killed several second-in-commands. The United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, Japan, , the European Union, , etc. all had to succumb under the strong pressure of the United States. Among them, the Soviet Union was broken up by the United States and became today's Russia. However, the United States still does not want to let it go, and is still suppressing it desperately.

Today, China has become the second most important country, unlike any other country in history. As Blinken said, "China is the only country that not only has the intention to reshape the international order, but also has the ability to do so." However, this evaluation is not accurate.

China does not want to reshape the international order. The international order that the United States calls is actually the order established by the United States. China has always abided by the true international order, which is the various international orders established by the United Nations, not the American order.

The United States puts domestic rules of the game above international ones, which is unacceptable to China.

To be precise, China is committed to maintaining and following the international order, opposing the hegemonism and power politics of the United States, and supporting global integration and multilateralism .

The so-called new order that China wants to establish is a community with a shared future for mankind, and this order is consistent with the spirit of the United Nations. It does not change the international order, but only makes it better and more complete.

The hegemony of the United States is precisely destroying the international order, and the United States is the real destroyer of the international order.

The reason why the American media can publish such calm articles is, I think, a new understanding and judgment based on facts.

The fact is that the United States' various containment, containment, and suppression of China have not achieved the expected results. Not only has it failed to defeat China, it has made China stronger.

Based on this fact, some relatively rational Americans have begun to reflect on whether what the US government is doing is correct and effective. That's why I wrote this relatively sensible article.

However, we do not have high expectations whether such an article can become the main theme of the US government and whether it can be absorbed.

Of course, having this sound is better than nothing. It would be beneficial to pour some cold water on the arrogant and overwhelmed US government.