In the middle of last year, the double reduction policy that shocked many students appeared. The purpose was to reduce the pressure on children to learn and reduce the learning burden on children. However, many people believe that such double reduction does not actually cause a reduction in the pressure, and many new learning habits also make children unable to adapt.
▲Student pressure
The reason for double reduction
The original intention was to help children reduce their learning pressure. Some students have to arrive at school at around 7 in the morning and finish school at around 5 in the evening. Some parents even ask their children to make up for classes on weekends. This phenomenon is even more serious in junior high school. Many students also report that they don’t have time to rest normally, let alone play games and watch mobile phones. Moreover, after such a cycle, it is basically difficult to have a comfortable sleep. The Ministry of Education also said that it could not stand it anymore. As primary and junior high schools with nine-year compulsory education, children should not be under such great pressure. Students should have the right to go to bed early at night and rest on weekends. The most important thing is to pay attention to learning efficiency. It is not the time to study. It is better to take an hour than to study for an hour.
▲Student pressure
Opposition of parents
Double reduction is obviously a good thing, but many parents are very worried that double reduction is almost no benefit, because double reduction can cause the current thing that children have more spare time. During this time, children do not study and stay at home every day. If they don’t study, they will not be able to improve their grades. Parents’ idea is to study hard as students and lay the test and preparation for future studies, but now they no longer study, which is the side effect that parents talk about.
▲Double reduction
Many parents think that their children will forget a lot of knowledge if they don’t use their spare time to study on weekends, and they will not be as good as other children who are studying. Some parents even feel that there is no pressure on their children to study. In today's era of intra-computing , students should study hard and do the right things instead of reducing stress. However, the double reduction policy has still been implemented, which means that the Ministry of Education, as a teacher, should know that qualified students' view means that students are a person with a big gap with adults, have a sense of self-independence, are people with development, and will not be changed by other people.
▲Double reduction
is really a side effect?
For such a situation, is it not effective for double reduction? For children, the pressure is reduced. The time that should have been rested was used for study, but now it has returned to rest. Is there anyone who objected to this situation? In fact, this is related to the concept of many parents. Since the Ministry of Education says that it is necessary to reduce stress, the teacher's course will be rescheduled to make the course more reasonable and ensure students' rest time after class.
However, some parents insist on intra-recording and comparing. It should be the time for children to study. Whether they watch TV or play with mobile phones, they are their freedom. However, parents think that their children should keep learning at this time, which means that policies are decreasing, but actions are not decreasing. As for the problem of being too playful and unwilling to learn, isn’t this exactly what parents should need to manage? Instead of throwing all the pressure of learning to the school and acting as a bystander. Many junior high school students can’t finish their homework every night at 10 o’clock and get up at around 6 o’clock in the morning. The same is true on weekends. Do parents think they can teach reasonably?
▲Student pressure
In order to successfully implement double reduction, many educational institutions took the lead in suspending classes, directly indicating that they refunded money and sold the venue to implement double reduction correctly. You should know that this is the source of income for these people. Without tutoring, the tutoring materials in the market began to decrease, and students would no longer do additional homework. In addition, the teaching market and quality of non-cultural courses such as Yinmei Sports have been strengthened to ensure the all-round development of students.Finally, I would like to ask a question, is whether readers think double reduction is a joke?
