—— Hunan University of Science and Technology 2019 "Vei Xin Cup" College Student Debate Final ended successfully
verbal battles, and the debate are smoke; eloquence is hanging, discussing right and wrong. At 14:30 on May 12, the final of the 2019 "Nei Xin Cup" College Student Debate Competition with the theme of "Youthful Hearts to the Party and Contribute to the New Era" was successfully held. The representatives of the school debate teams of Central South University of Forestry and Science and Technology , Xiangtan University , and Hunan University of Engineering serve as judges. After several fierce competitions, the team of the Pro-Fang School of Humanities and the Anti-Fang School of Computer Science and Engineering (hereinafter referred to as the "School of Computer Science") have overcome difficulties and stood out with their outstanding talents and eloquence. The two teams with equal strength debated on "Slash Life/Craftsman Spirit is More Worth Pursuing", bringing the audience a fierce and exciting debate feast.
Judges scored
The representative team of the Pro-Fang Humanities School holds the view that "life is more worthy of pursuit" and the representative team of the Anti-Fang Computer Academy holds the view that "craftsman spirit is more worthy of pursuit". Before the competition started, the video of both parties was played. The video content was humorous and interesting, which made the contestants relax and encouraged their morale. In the opening argumentation, the positive side discussed its own views based on the background of the times, based on the social problems and personal needs that need to be solved urgently at present. The opposition explained the connotation of "craftsman spirit" straightforwardly and specifically explained the importance of choosing "craftsman spirit" for social progress and cultural inheritance. During the four debates, most of the two parties adopt the questioning method of "yes or not" and "whether they agree", and try to get information from the other party every minute and every second that is conducive to their own party's establishment of advantages.
Pro-side second debate
The pro-side second debate refuted and debated the arguments of the two sides' first debate, which gradually warmed up the scene. The opposing debater's second debate is strong in momentum, the positive debater's second debater's clear logic, and their distinctive debate styles greatly attracted the audience's interest. Both sides seized the other party's loopholes and refuted them and added more examples to consolidate their own arguments. The second debater of the opposing side stands at the foot of the "craftsman spirit" is conducive to cultural inheritance, and the second debater of the opposing side also gave examples of "slash life" that can achieve cultural inheritance.
The questioning process of the opposing three debates
3 debate is not only a test of the speed of the three debates, but also a test of the ability of other debaters to respond. The questioning and summary of both sides mainly revolves around the general public's life choices and energy distribution issues, and initially involves two separate battlefields: "Cultural inheritance and social problems resolution". "The impetuous trend is prevalent in today's society, and confused young people should focus on their main business and should not be half-hearted." The opposing three defense force said. But the third debater of the prosecution was not outdone. "Responsibility and love can be taken into account, love is not accepted perfunctory, and focusing on the main business does not prevent us from pursuing other things we love."
Representative of the judges commented
The confrontation between the two sides is more intense in the free debate, and the two battlefields of "cultural inheritance and social development" are constantly promoted, which also involves the realization of personal values and social values. At the same time, the pros and cons have further argued on the issue of energy allocation, and the example of "as a teacher, you can also be a photographer" has appeared repeatedly. The game gradually entered a white-hot stage, and the enthusiasm of the audience off the court gradually increased. The summary statements of the pros and cons are also wonderful. The opposing side gave a detailed explanation of the development issues of the "high-end and sophisticated industries" in the free debate, and pointed out that the positive side has a value orientation of evasion. The positive side also cleverly used "computer linguistics" to argue the point of view and reiterated the idea that "responsibility and love can be taken into account."
Audience question
Audience’s questions about the positive and negative debaters were also in full swing after the judges left the seat for comments. The laughter on the court was completely different from the tense atmosphere in the previous game. Before the results of the competition came out, He Lijia, the captain of the debate team of Hunan Engineering College, made a brief comment. He briefly analyzed all aspects of the field and explained the scoring points."I personally think that the debate topic can be poetic, and we also look forward to the debaters being able to play a different style, but judging from the performance of this game, the whole process is somewhat limited to the traditional offensive and defensive style, which is also related to the status of the players on the field."
championship team took a group photo
"Vietly New Cup" final came to an end. The second debater of the Zhengfang Fang Luo Jiaqi won the best debater, and the winning team was the representative team of the Zhengfang College of Humanities. "I was really tired in the late stage of preparing for the game. I fought until late every day, but fortunately I didn't let everyone down. My love for debate is not only its own charm, but also the friendship of relying on mutual help with my teammates." said Guo Xingmeng, a third debater from the Zhengfang Humanities Academy's representative team.
News: Zhao Penglin
Photography: Qin Jingyu
Editor-in-chief: Han Xiaobo
Typesetting: Fan Yuhan
