Author: Text/Yu Ziqi
Since October, we have almost been troubled by the news of typhoons, followed by the problem of cold air. However, in addition to these natural phenomena, earthquakes have also occurred. According to data from China Earthquake Monitoring Network, on October 24, another strong earthquake of magnitude 6 or above occurred around the world, which was located in the waters north of Ascension Island, with a magnitude 6.3 level, with a central coordinate of 1.08 degrees south latitude and 13.82 degrees west longitude. U.S. Geological Survey also showed magnitude 6.3. After multiple observations by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, it was finally confirmed that there was no tsunami. The depth of this earthquake was 10 kilometers.
From the scientific data, there were 3 earthquakes above magnitude 6 this month, and this magnitude 6.3 earthquake was also the second in October. The strongest one was the magnitude 6.5 earthquake, located in the area of the Vanuatu Islands. In terms of time, the magnitude 6.3 earthquake was also an earthquake three days after the magnitude 6.5 earthquake. So if we use data, the earthquake data is fine. Compared with the previous few months, the activity level of earthquakes is much lower. So don’t think that there have been several strong earthquakes recently, just say that the earth’s activity level is higher and unstable.
According to scientific statistics, the number of earthquakes above magnitude 5 (including magnitude 5) is 16 (including 3 strong earthquakes above magnitude 6), which is indeed more than magnitude 6 earthquakes. There is no way to do this. The earth's plates or fault zones may be in motion almost at all times. Most of the causes of earthquakes on our earth have a certain relationship with them. After each earthquake, we can see some reports explaining what the earth's plate is causing it. There are relatively few reports of small earthquakes, so everyone should be aware of earthquake defense at any time, and earthquakes are very sudden.
earthquakes cannot be predicted in science, and this is not the first day. Although we often see people talking about the probability of earthquakes, including a few days ago, we saw a report published by Science magazine saying that the Garlock fault in California, USA was moving, which may trigger the occurrence of an 8.0-magnitude earthquake. This statement is actually a probability problem. It is the result given by analyzing the changes in the fault zone. Are you saying that he is true? In fact, no one knows that they are all expressed in terms of "possibility".
And here we emphasize another problem, that is, the occurrence of earthquakes cannot be predicted, because all the movement mechanisms of earthquakes are almost based on "activity". Everyone should understand that how to judge things in "activity" is completely unregular. If you can know its future direction of movement, earthquake prediction may be realized. It is because you don't know and other reasons, so it cannot be predicted. As for the explanation of earthquake cloud , earthquake fish, biological abnormalities, etc., we have also seen the explanation of earthquake clouds, , earthquake fish, biological abnormalities, and the scientific community has repeatedly emphasized that it is impossible to explain earthquakes. The most reliable earthquake is the only earthquake warning. Although this is not as good as earthquake prediction, it can also reduce a lot of impact. The method of establishment is a way after the earthquake occurs. It has been emphasized many times here that it is a competition between seismic wave and time. Before the earthquake waves reach the earthquake-destroying area, we will be able to receive news about the earthquake. At this time, everyone can adopt a fast anti-seismic strategy to minimize the impact of the earthquake as much as possible. Therefore, this method is still worthy of scientists to study. In the future, we will have more time to defend. Now the world is implementing earthquake warnings, which are already in full swing. Thank you for reading!
