#In recent years, there have been a lot of hot discussions about the 30 years of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Even since the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, the status of my country's industrial entrepreneurship history has become the focus of controversy. Some people even distort and misinterpret many phenomena at that time. #
In the past two days, I have seen some videos and articles online. The point of view is that in the past, state-owned enterprises established kindergartens, primary and secondary schools, employee dormitories, and large canteens, the so-called privileges of state-owned enterprises in the past. "Unfair" to the majority of farmers.
To be objective and fair, this kind of remark is to deliberately use farmers to talk about things in a distorted way. Second, we have "a little understanding" about the history of industrial entrepreneurship in the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Third, the internal and external environment at that time, the overall composition of hard-working entrepreneurs and identities was not clear at all. Fourth, use the current conditions to measure the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, etc.
Let’s use three representative examples to illustrate why state-owned enterprises at that time had to set up various types of school for employees and dormitories, etc. so-called welfare.
1, Daqing Oilfield at that time entrepreneurial conditions. The place where the oil was explored at that time was called Beidahuang . Listen to the name, it is a desolate area with nothing. In this poor and backward place, we need to start a business with a large-scale enterprise. May I ask if there are many troops to eat and drink, if a large number of young people get married and have children, and if older employees and their families reunite.
No matter how good people think, don’t they need “human fireworks”?
It is the care of the country that allows these hard-working people to build factories and live homes. The factory grew day by day, and the majority of employees and their families became stable. Only when you have a house to live in, have food to eat, and children can learn.
2, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps , Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center , Angang , 71st Plant and 201 Plant, Baotou Steel Plant, FAW-2 Automobile, etc., etc. The situation of many large state-owned enterprises and early stages of entrepreneurship is similar to that of Daqing Oilfield. You said, do such state-owned enterprises need kindergartens, and do employees want a place to live? Do these families want to find employment?
3. An introduction to building a company and developing it into a city has also been explained in detail in the previous article. For example, after the Daqing Oilfield, there is the current complete Daqing City . With Panzhihua Steel , Panzhihua Market and so on have been expanded. This is how many cities are now born.
At the same time, the housing and various schools in these cities were basically based on enterprises.
For example, 40 years ago, a school for children of a large state-owned enterprise in the north was not just a solution to the children of employees of the factory itself. The problem of difficulty in enrolling in surrounding farmers and soldiers has also been solved. The phenomenon of state-owned enterprises in other remote areas is similar.
A large number of facts have proved that if you don’t understand the true entrepreneurial history of state-owned enterprises, you should not deliberately distort some things. Take the Shanghai Baosteel built after the reform and opening up as an example. At that time, the Baoshan area was relatively desolate. Therefore, the problems of employees' housing and children's schooling also need to be solved by enterprises.
long story short. Anyway, even now the economy is so developed. It is also unscientific for state-owned enterprises in remote areas to cancel kindergartens, etc. This has nothing to do with the so-called "privileges" of state-owned enterprise employees.
(Next article, from the perspective of farmers really entering the city, was it really "unfair" in the past?)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-