First , Wuchang ? As the name suggests, it is the five permanent members of the UN Security Council , and it is also the ballast for the stability of the international order after World War II . Whether the world is chaotic or not is the most influential person in the world today.
55日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日本日� Chang: The King of the Security Council
One of the six major institutions under the United Nations was established on January 13, 1946. It is the only agency with the right to take military action. It is currently composed of 15 members, including 5 permanent members (China, Russia, the United States, Britain and France) and 10 non-permanent members (election by the General Assembly for two years)
Chairman takes turns to make the first letter of the member states
First, the country victorious in World War II
So, should we become a permanent member of the Security Council? The prerequisite is the country that won World War II, after all! To put it bluntly, the permanent member of the Security Council is the product of the victory of World War II. The original intention is nothing more than to maintain the post-war international order.
Wuchang: The product of the victory of World War II
Secondly, look at the comprehensive national strength
How awesome are the bosses of Wuchang? The total economic output accounts for 50% of the world (US$85 trillion), of which the United States is 24%, China is 17%, the United Kingdom is 3.3%, France is 3.1%, and Russia is 1.9%; military expenditure accounts for 60% of the total (US$2 trillion)
Five Constant: The most important leader
Finally, look at international popularity
key! Want to become a permanent member of the Security Council? There must be 2/3 of the votes in favor of the United Nations member states. This is just a symbolic entry ticket. The key is to pass the five permanent members’ votes unanimously. Therefore, popularity is very important and indispensable.
Get the best and have many helpers, lose the way and have few helpers
After knowing the whole story, look around the world: Which country has the most chance to join the five permanent members?
First, the most fussy
Land area is about 2.98 million㎞², the seventh in the world; population 1.3 billion, the second in the world; GDP
fanciful and confident South Asia No. 1
Advantage : good international popularity, it is the target of winning the major countries, and is expected to gain 2/3 of the United Nations member states supported and 9 out of 15 members supported. Although the overall national strength is not as good as the top and the bottom, it is barely entering the threshold;
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 The key is also to look at the unanimous support of the Five Chang bosses. If any family opposes, India's dream of entering the Chang will turn into a bubble. On the surface, they all support it, but in fact they all oppose
heart is higher than the sky and life is thinner than paper
India's six failures to join the Chang:
2005 first application, four Changs all support it, and then end with Russian opposing
2008 second application, four Changs all support it, and finally end with French opposing
Five Changs consensus, and take turns to reject
2012 third application, All four Changs supported it, and finally ended with UK opposition
2017 fourth application, all four Changs supported it, and finally ended with US opposition
Ideals are full, reality is skinny
2019 fifth application, all four Changs supported it, and finally ended with China opposition
2021 sixth application, all four Changs supported it, and finally ended with US opposition
5 Changs: tacit understanding
visible , India dreams of becoming a permanent contemporary? The heart is higher than the sky and the life is thinner than the paper. His six times he entered the Congregation, and his original intention remained unchanged. He was the most popular country and became a big joke in the international community.
Haha! After a while, another year of
Land area is about 358,000 cm, ranking seventh in Europe and 63rd in the world; population is 83 million, ranking 17th in the world, second only to Russia in Europe; GDP is 4.2 trillion US dollars, ranking 4th in the world, ranking first in Europe; military potential is not inferior to Britain and France among the Five Continentals,
Germany: the leader of the European economy
Entering the Dream : It began in the last century In the 1990s, thanks to economic development and the establishment of the EU, in 2004, the Schroeder period began to form a "Permanent Alliance" with India, Japan, and Brazil. In 2005, the Merkel and the Merkel and also expressed their intention to become a Permanent. Recently, the Scholz and also made a statement,
"Four-Nation Alliance" that brings together to keep warm
advantages: a European economy leader, a veritable strongest industrial and technological core in Europe, and the international popularity and reputation are also good. The European version of "hiding your strength and keeping your low profile" Make a fortune in silence. "The comprehensive national strength is better than Britain and France;
European's rare industrial country
disadvantages : A completely defeated country in World War II was one of the core of the Nazi fascist Axis powers back then, so it will inevitably be questioned by the international community. You must know that the United Nations and the Security Council were established to curb the defeated country in World War II;
The United States and Italy and other countries oppose
Can you see , Germany's dream of becoming a permanent member? Even if the comprehensive national strength reaches the threshold for entry into the permanent, it is understandable that India has more advantages than South Asia's No. 1 leader in South Asia, but it is difficult to join the Five Constant State as a defeated country. Besides, there are enough representatives in Europe.
Can it be? First ask about the UK and France
Land area is about 380,000 cm, ranking 62 in the world, Asia 17 in the world; population 120 million, ranking 11 in the world; GDP 4.9 trillion US dollars, third in the world; military strength should be outside the five permanent members,
"Chrysanthemum and the Sword" Japanese
dream of entering the permanent members : It began in 1980, and in the next 40 years, Japan did not give up its application for entering the permanent members, and in 2004 and 2007, it applied to join the "Four-Country Alliance" twice,
Advantages : It is similar to Germany. It is both an important country in the world economy today, and it is also an important link in the global industrial chain. Its popularity is also good in addition to neighboring countries;
Disadvantages : It is also very similar to Germany. It is also an economic giant and a political dwarf. What is bad is that they are defeated countries, unless the Security Council can reform in the future;
can be seen , Japan's dream of becoming a permanent person? , India, Germany and Brazil, and other countries all returned without exception. The reason is similar to Germany, and their enthusiasm is comparable to India.
There is not much time left for Japan
Land area is about 8.51 million㎞², fifth in the world; population is 210 million, fifth in the world; GDP is 1.6 trillion US dollars, 12th in the world; military strength is weaker than that of the above-mentioned one,
Brazil: accounts for about 45% of South America
Entering the dream : The experience is similar to India, and it was once the five after World War II Of course, there are also differences in popular candidate countries. First of all, Brazil is not as enthusiastic as the three countries above.
Advantages : As the No. 1 South American leader who lives in a corner and is indifferent to the world, international popularity is indeed good. In addition to neighboring Argentina , it is okay, and its comprehensive national strength is also normal;
disadvantages : Success is on the edge and defeat is on the edge. The fifth largest country in the world has such a disproportionate sense of existence and influence. The key is! There is no intention;
can be seen , Brazilian dreams? is optional and does not matter. It depends entirely on teammates (Four Kingdoms Alliance) to pull and pull together to apply. The enthusiasm is the lowest among the four countries.
Brazil: The conditions for entering the permanent rank are really good
To sum up: It can be seen that this "Four-Countries Joining the Permanent Alliance" has its own merits
India : Being powerless, defeated repeatedly, have good international popularity, and be able to get along with everyone;
German : Have strength, have no life, defeated countries +European powers are in a fierce competition;
Four-Countries? India and Pakistan have greater chances
Japan : Have strength, no life, defeated country +Around the countries doubt and suspicion;
Brazil : No desires and no desires, dispensable, on the contrary, the actual conditions for entering the permanent are the best;
Germany and Japan? The chance is relatively small.
is visible. The best conditions for entering the normal world? In fact, it is Brazil and India. The reasons are as follows:
First of all, Brazil : South America, which is located in the fourth continent (about 12% of the land), has a population of 430 million, accounting for about 5.6% of the world. Among them, Brazil accounts for about 45% of South America
So , if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? Brazil is well-deserved as one of the first choices. After all, it is really unreasonable that there is no "Five Constant" in a continent, but it has a greater chance.
Brazil: South American things are rare and expensive
Secondly, India : Asia, which is located in the world's largest continent (accounting for about 29% of the land area), with a total of 48 countries/population of 4.4 billion (accounting for about 60% of the world). India is also a major country,
So , if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? India is also one of the candidates in the "Four-Country Alliance to Join the Permanent", at least with greater chances than Japan and Germany. After all, Asia has enough room for expansion.
Enter the PR: India's dream of a great power
Again, Germany : Europe, which is the sixth continent in the world (accounting for about 6.8% of the land area), a total of 48 countries and regions, with a population of 800 million (accounting for about 10.5% of the global population)
So , what if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? Germany can be said to be the one with the slimmest chance of joining the Permanent Alliance, after all! The small Europe already has two seats + defeated countries.
European seats, unless
finally, Japan : Asia, which is the world's largest continent (accounts about 29% of the land), with a total of 48 countries/population of 4.4 billion (accounts about 60% of the world), among which Japan is one of the core,
So , what if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? Japan has a chance in theory, after all, Asia is big enough, what can I do! Like Germany, they are defeated countries, so the chance of joining the Continental is also slim.
There is not much time left for Japan
Of course, in addition to this, they also need to face fierce competition from other countries
First of all, African countries
After all, Africa is the second continent in the world, with a total of 60 countries and regions, with a population of 1.2 billion (about 13% of the global population)
So, Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? African countries will have a great chance of winning, after all! There is no representative of Africa among the Five Constant Persons.
Africa is big enough and its seats are expected to be
Secondly, South American countries
After all, South America is the fourth continent in the world (about 12% of the land area) in total 13 countries, with a population of 430 million accounts for about 5.6% of the world.
So, the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? South American countries are also one of the popular selected countries, after all, there is no representative of South American among the Five Constant People.
One's words, for reference only
Finally, to sum up, it is not difficult to see: Africa and South American countries have more opportunities
African candidate : The strongest Egypt , the richest per capita South Africa, as well as population and GDP The most , Nigeria ;
, South America candidate state-owned : Brazil, the strongest, others, Argentina, barely;
build a community with a shared future for mankind
In short, , looks around the world: Which country has the most chance to join the Wuchang? : In terms of representative/subscription cake, Africa and South American countries have the most chance, and I am more optimistic about Brazil and Egypt.
One words, for reference only
Haha! After a while, another year of
Land area is about 358,000 cm, ranking seventh in Europe and 63rd in the world; population is 83 million, ranking 17th in the world, second only to Russia in Europe; GDP is 4.2 trillion US dollars, ranking 4th in the world, ranking first in Europe; military potential is not inferior to Britain and France among the Five Continentals,
Germany: the leader of the European economy
Entering the Dream : It began in the last century In the 1990s, thanks to economic development and the establishment of the EU, in 2004, the Schroeder period began to form a "Permanent Alliance" with India, Japan, and Brazil. In 2005, the Merkel and the Merkel and also expressed their intention to become a Permanent. Recently, the Scholz and also made a statement,
"Four-Nation Alliance" that brings together to keep warm
advantages: a European economy leader, a veritable strongest industrial and technological core in Europe, and the international popularity and reputation are also good. The European version of "hiding your strength and keeping your low profile" Make a fortune in silence. "The comprehensive national strength is better than Britain and France;
European's rare industrial country
disadvantages : A completely defeated country in World War II was one of the core of the Nazi fascist Axis powers back then, so it will inevitably be questioned by the international community. You must know that the United Nations and the Security Council were established to curb the defeated country in World War II;
The United States and Italy and other countries oppose
Can you see , Germany's dream of becoming a permanent member? Even if the comprehensive national strength reaches the threshold for entry into the permanent, it is understandable that India has more advantages than South Asia's No. 1 leader in South Asia, but it is difficult to join the Five Constant State as a defeated country. Besides, there are enough representatives in Europe.
Can it be? First ask about the UK and France
Land area is about 380,000 cm, ranking 62 in the world, Asia 17 in the world; population 120 million, ranking 11 in the world; GDP 4.9 trillion US dollars, third in the world; military strength should be outside the five permanent members,
"Chrysanthemum and the Sword" Japanese
dream of entering the permanent members : It began in 1980, and in the next 40 years, Japan did not give up its application for entering the permanent members, and in 2004 and 2007, it applied to join the "Four-Country Alliance" twice,
Advantages : It is similar to Germany. It is both an important country in the world economy today, and it is also an important link in the global industrial chain. Its popularity is also good in addition to neighboring countries;
Disadvantages : It is also very similar to Germany. It is also an economic giant and a political dwarf. What is bad is that they are defeated countries, unless the Security Council can reform in the future;
can be seen , Japan's dream of becoming a permanent person? , India, Germany and Brazil, and other countries all returned without exception. The reason is similar to Germany, and their enthusiasm is comparable to India.
There is not much time left for Japan
Land area is about 8.51 million㎞², fifth in the world; population is 210 million, fifth in the world; GDP is 1.6 trillion US dollars, 12th in the world; military strength is weaker than that of the above-mentioned one,
Brazil: accounts for about 45% of South America
Entering the dream : The experience is similar to India, and it was once the five after World War II Of course, there are also differences in popular candidate countries. First of all, Brazil is not as enthusiastic as the three countries above.
Advantages : As the No. 1 South American leader who lives in a corner and is indifferent to the world, international popularity is indeed good. In addition to neighboring Argentina , it is okay, and its comprehensive national strength is also normal;
disadvantages : Success is on the edge and defeat is on the edge. The fifth largest country in the world has such a disproportionate sense of existence and influence. The key is! There is no intention;
can be seen , Brazilian dreams? is optional and does not matter. It depends entirely on teammates (Four Kingdoms Alliance) to pull and pull together to apply. The enthusiasm is the lowest among the four countries.
Brazil: The conditions for entering the permanent rank are really good
To sum up: It can be seen that this "Four-Countries Joining the Permanent Alliance" has its own merits
India : Being powerless, defeated repeatedly, have good international popularity, and be able to get along with everyone;
German : Have strength, have no life, defeated countries +European powers are in a fierce competition;
Four-Countries? India and Pakistan have greater chances
Japan : Have strength, no life, defeated country +Around the countries doubt and suspicion;
Brazil : No desires and no desires, dispensable, on the contrary, the actual conditions for entering the permanent are the best;
Germany and Japan? The chance is relatively small.
is visible. The best conditions for entering the normal world? In fact, it is Brazil and India. The reasons are as follows:
First of all, Brazil : South America, which is located in the fourth continent (about 12% of the land), has a population of 430 million, accounting for about 5.6% of the world. Among them, Brazil accounts for about 45% of South America
So , if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? Brazil is well-deserved as one of the first choices. After all, it is really unreasonable that there is no "Five Constant" in a continent, but it has a greater chance.
Brazil: South American things are rare and expensive
Secondly, India : Asia, which is located in the world's largest continent (accounting for about 29% of the land area), with a total of 48 countries/population of 4.4 billion (accounting for about 60% of the world). India is also a major country,
So , if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? India is also one of the candidates in the "Four-Country Alliance to Join the Permanent", at least with greater chances than Japan and Germany. After all, Asia has enough room for expansion.
Enter the PR: India's dream of a great power
Again, Germany : Europe, which is the sixth continent in the world (accounting for about 6.8% of the land area), a total of 48 countries and regions, with a population of 800 million (accounting for about 10.5% of the global population)
So , what if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? Germany can be said to be the one with the slimmest chance of joining the Permanent Alliance, after all! The small Europe already has two seats + defeated countries.
European seats, unless
finally, Japan : Asia, which is the world's largest continent (accounts about 29% of the land), with a total of 48 countries/population of 4.4 billion (accounts about 60% of the world), among which Japan is one of the core,
So , what if the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? Japan has a chance in theory, after all, Asia is big enough, what can I do! Like Germany, they are defeated countries, so the chance of joining the Continental is also slim.
There is not much time left for Japan
Of course, in addition to this, they also need to face fierce competition from other countries
First of all, African countries
After all, Africa is the second continent in the world, with a total of 60 countries and regions, with a population of 1.2 billion (about 13% of the global population)
So, Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? African countries will have a great chance of winning, after all! There is no representative of Africa among the Five Constant Persons.
Africa is big enough and its seats are expected to be
Secondly, South American countries
After all, South America is the fourth continent in the world (about 12% of the land area) in total 13 countries, with a population of 430 million accounts for about 5.6% of the world.
So, the Security Council wants to reform and expand its members? South American countries are also one of the popular selected countries, after all, there is no representative of South American among the Five Constant People.
One's words, for reference only
Finally, to sum up, it is not difficult to see: Africa and South American countries have more opportunities
African candidate : The strongest Egypt , the richest per capita South Africa, as well as population and GDP The most , Nigeria ;
, South America candidate state-owned : Brazil, the strongest, others, Argentina, barely;
build a community with a shared future for mankind
In short, , looks around the world: Which country has the most chance to join the Wuchang? : In terms of representative/subscription cake, Africa and South American countries have the most chance, and I am more optimistic about Brazil and Egypt.
One words, for reference only
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-