In recent years, many listed companies have inflated their performance and artificially created false prosperity has become a fashion. More and more listed companies are joining this trend, either delivering false information about the company's performance to investors, raising the company's stock price, and bringing benefits to the company; or providing financing loans for the company's further development; or due to the company's failure Profitability is insufficient, and 's cash flow has entered a downward spiral. In order to save the company from crisis, it has to take desperate risks. Regardless of the purpose, they must face legal risks - administrative fines or criminal penalties.
Recently, Jiangsu Province Changzhou Zhaosha Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Changzhou Zhaosha) reported on the real name: In order to create false prosperity, Black Peony (Collective) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as: Black Peony), Huafu Fashion Co., Ltd. Company (hereinafter referred to as: Huafu Fashion), Wanshili Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as: Wanshili) and other three listed companies used their respective holding companies to conduct false related transactions through the link of Changzhou Xingsha. So, by what means did they conduct transactions?
html On July 13, in order to understand the truth, reporters rushed to many places to conduct investigations and visits.
(Illustration of 54 delivery orders stamped by Zhejiang Jufeng)
Party involved: The secret behind the 54 delivery orders
When I saw Wang Wei, the insider of Changzhou , it was already 9 a.m. the next day. point. In the office, Wang Wei told reporters that in 2016, Shi Wei, the head of Hangzhou Hoya Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Hangzhou Hoya), a 100%-controlled subsidiary of Wanshili, approached Changzhou Yarn Search Company and said that he wanted to contact Huafu Fashion Co., Ltd. The holding company Zhejiang Jufeng Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Zhejiang Jufeng) purchases cotton yarn and has a large capital gap and needs financing. Wang Wei found Black Peony Holding Company Shanghai Shenghui Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shanghai Shenghui) to broker the matter. Thus, a transaction involving four companies began.
The transaction procedure is as follows: Hangzhou Hoya sends part of the payment deposit to Changzhou Yarn, Changzhou Yarn then calls Shanghai Shenghui, and after Shanghai Shenghui makes up the entire payment, it calls the seller Zhejiang Jufeng. Then, Zhejiang Jufeng started shipping. After Hangzhou Hoya received the goods, it returned Shanghai Shenghui's financing to Changzhou to find yarn, and Changzhou found yarn and then remitted it to Shanghai Shenghui. In this process, Shanghai Shenghui and Changzhou Zhaosha are considered as brokers and will receive a certain commission.
The above transaction has been carried out more than a dozen times and has always been very smooth. But in December 2019, everything changed. Wang Wei accidentally called the mobile phone numbers of the truck drivers listed on the 54 cargo orders in the last transaction. As a result, more than a dozen drivers stated that they had never hauled any cargo to Changzhou. They have fixed routes and don’t use the Changzhou route at all. He suddenly felt scared, so he called all the mobile phone numbers on the 54 cargo lists again, but still no driver said he had pulled goods like cotton yarn. Wang Wei felt that he had been deceived. Isn't this what people often call a false transaction? 54 The bill of goods is completely fabricated. In fact, the goods do not really exist. "The order is followed but the goods are not delivered." Isn't this the truth of the transaction? They have gone into a closed-loop mode! Hangzhou Hoya bought goods from Zhejiang Jufeng, Zhejiang Jufeng bought goods from Hangzhou Hoya, and the payment went around in a circle, and finally ended up at Hangzhou Hoya. It doesn't matter whether the goods are available or not. As long as everyone places orders and tickets, has transaction records, and has performance, everything will be fine. In this closed-loop trade, Wang Wei unwittingly became an accomplice of the three listed companies' false transactions.
At the end of the interview, Wang Wei added: "The most ridiculous thing is that after I discovered that they were making false transactions, I asked them to explain, but they ignored me and showed no remorse. In order to silence me, they took the 54 The concocted manifests were linked together, and a lawsuit was filed with Changzhou Zhaosha in a grand manner. Hangzhou Huoya claimed to demand the goods, and Shanghai Shenghui claimed to demand money. Isn't this a thief's cry to catch the thief, knowing that there is something wrong with the manifest? False bill of goods, you will also need to file a lawsuit.However, after all, these companies are listed companies and large enterprises, and Shanghai Shenghui is a Black Peony Holding Company with a state-owned background. The connections in all aspects are really great. It’s hard to say who will lose and who will win. "
" (Illustration: Two delivery order numbers 9810752239 overlap)
Reporter investigation: 54 cargo orders do have problems
During the investigation, the reporter carefully compared the 54 cargo orders and found two problems: First, the order numbers of the two delivery orders overlap. The delivery order number 9810752239 was delivered twice by different drivers. The delivery date was November 6th. The driver information: Car number: Lu RK16**, mobile phone number: 1379300****; the first delivery date is November 7, driver information: car number: Xin B638**, mobile phone number: 1356500**** Reporter. The second problem discovered is that the delivery time does not make logical sense. The reporter learned that this batch of goods was delivered from Aksu, Xinjiang, to Changzhou, Jiangsu. The distance between the two places is about 4,500 kilometers, and it takes at least 10 days for the truck to go back and forth. Time. However, two drivers delivered the goods twice in one day or two days. The order number 9810754285 and the order number 9810754263 were delivered by the same driver. The first delivery was on November 22, 2019. The first delivery was on November 24, 2019. The driver information of the two orders was: Hebei DP30**, 1560585****; the order number 9810754123 and the order number 9810754158 were also sent by the same person. The driver delivered the goods, once on November 17, 2019, and once on November 18, 2019. The driver’s information was: Lu RC16**, 1335540****. Subsequently, the reporter called 54 more items. Among the mobile phone numbers of all truck drivers in the order, 37 drivers clearly stated that they had never delivered to Changzhou, 8 drivers said that it had been a long time and they could not remember clearly, and 9 drivers could not be contacted.
In response to the above situation, reporters. We tried to contact the three listed companies and their respective holding companies by email, phone calls, and letters to seek explanations and clarifications on the relevant false transactions. As of press time, none of the three listed companies and their holding companies had received any information. Reply.
(Illustration: The time interval between the four delivery orders is abnormal)
Lawyer: Using fabricated delivery orders as evidence may lead to litigation or criminal prosecution.
Regarding the fact that three listed companies were involved in false transactions, a well-known lawyer from Jingshi Law Firm (Zhengzhou) Lawyer Zhong Jingqian said that in recent years, the main purpose of listed companies in creating false prosperity is actually to whitewash their performance, inflate sales, defraud the trust of shareholders, and avoid the risk of delisting. In fact, this may be suspected of inflating value-added tax. Invoice, securities fraud, etc. However, this is not too much. If you know that the relevant bill of goods is concocted, but insist on submitting it to the court and filing a lawsuit, this is no longer as simple as an administrative fine. Relevant companies may be involved in false lawsuits.
