Introduction: The authoritative nature of textbooks has always been recognized by everyone. From the perspective and direction of question setting such as junior high school, junior high school entrance examination, and college entrance examination, they all cannot be separated from textbooks. However, in recent years, textbooks have caused doubts from the outside world due to some problems. For example, the illustration problem in the People's Education Press primary school textbook that was a hot topic some time ago was pointed out by careful friends that distorted the aesthetic view of primary school students. If it is not modified in time, it will be detrimental to the growth and development of primary school students. Finally, after the fermentation of public opinion, the problem has now been solved.
recently entered the hot topic of textbook topics again, such as the "Heaven will give great responsibilities to this man" that has always been familiar to many people. The real way to read it is "Heaven will give great responsibilities to this man". "It's a human being" not "This human being" , which really makes many friends born in the 1980s and 1990s unable to hold back, because in their memory, it's simply inexplicable how this human being became a human being.
Some unwilling friends began to read the textbooks, and some even took out the historical textbook versions to compare them one by one. Finally, they found that everyone was wrong. From reading the textbook versions from various historical periods from the 1960s to the 1980s and 1990s, they were indeed "human" and not "this person".
What is the reason for this? What makes the collective memory of post-80s and post-90s confused? Perhaps it has a lot to do with the ancient poetry and classical Chinese that we have learned. For example, "This person" appears many times in Chinese textbooks, so everyone can also remember "This person" in Mencius's 's work " born in distress and die from happiness " as "This person".
Hangzhou elementary school students discovered a mistake in the mathematics textbook and received likes from netizens
We all know that mathematics emphasizes rigor. Even in study and exams, a word difference may bring about a huge difference in the meaning of the question. The importance of mathematics plays an irreplaceable role in primary, junior, high school and even in college. In real life, we use mathematics a lot. Just a few days ago, a primary school student from Hangzhou discovered the controversy and errors in the textbook for the first volume of the sixth grade mathematics in the People's Education Press.
This has caused heated discussions and likes from netizens. Many people believe that this child can find faults from textbooks, and this spirit is worthy of encouragement and affirmation.
There is a question on page 47 of the first volume of this textbook: "Xiao Min and Xiao Liang bought the same exercise book. Xiao Min bought 6 books, spending 12 yuan in total; Xiao Liang bought 8 books, spending 20 yuan in total. The ratio of the number of exercise books Xiao Min and Xiao Liang bought is (): ( ), the ratio is ( ); the ratio is ( ): ( ) and the ratio is ( ). "
For most people, if they do not read the meaning of the question carefully, it is easy to calculate the answer according to the method done in the picture, but this careful child found that there is a problem, which is for "the meaning and premise of comparison".
So from its rigorous perspective, the answers and results obtained are completely different from the reference results given in the textbook, which is really surprising.
elementary school students wrote a letter and sent an email, people education club will respond to
In response to this problem, the primary school student in Hangzhou also wrote a special letter. From the letter, we can see that this child is very serious, and the difference between this child can be seen from the neat fonts alone.
From the letter, we can find that this child has a very rigorous idea. He expressed his views on the question and gave an explanation he thought was reasonable. Finally, he also hopes that the official of the People's Education Press can give a strong explanation or explanation for his response.
. Judging from the follow-up situation, relevant staff of the People's Education Press said that they had received a letter from this elementary school student and would give corresponding responses. We also look forward to a satisfactory result in the future.
As the editor, publisher and publisher of the textbook, it can humbly accept doubts. This attitude has been unanimously recognized by everyone.At the same time, the spirit of this Hangzhou primary school student's courage to question and discover problems is also worth learning from and reference. How do you view this?
