This requires children to have critical thinking and verify doubts. If you want to gain this ability, you might as well take a look at the picture book "The True Story of the Three Little Pigs".

In this information age, people have a variety of channels for obtaining knowledge, and the quality of obtaining knowledge is also uneven. How should children selectively accept useful and correct information for themselves? This requires children to have critical thinking and verify doubts. If you want to gain this ability, you might as well take a look at the picture book "The True Story of the Three Little Pigs".

I believe everyone is familiar with the story of the three little pigs. In the story, in order to eat the little pig, the wild wolf blows down the straw house of the first little pig, knocks over the wooden house of the second little pig, and finally loses in front of the brick house of the third little pig. But is this a true story? Let’s take a look at the story of the three little pigs from the perspective of the big wild wolf.

The story begins with the self-reported account of a wild wolf being interviewed in prison. His name is Alexander, and he is now called the "bad wolf". The cause of the story is a severe cold and a cup of sugar. When the wild wolf was making birthday cake for the old lady, he caught a severe cold and kept sneezing. Unfortunately, he used up his candy.

So the wild wolf went out to borrow candy from his neighbor Xiaozhu. The pig was not smart and lived in a house built by straw. When borrowing candy, the big wild wolf's nose began to itch, and a sneeze broke out, and a straw house collapsed instantly, and the neighbor Xiaozhu was crushed to death by straw. But for the wolf, it is a shame to give up the good pork in the haystack, so the wolf ate the piglet.

But the wild wolf still lacks a cup of sugar, so he went to find Pig Lao Er again. He lives in a wooden house. Pig Lao Er heard the wolf's voice and did not intend to let him in. But at this time, his nose was itchy again, and a big sneeze came out. In a similar plot, the wooden house collapsed and the pig's dick was crushed to death by the wood. Of course, the wild wolf did not let go of the delicious food that was in his mouth and ate the pig's dick.

However, the wild wolf still lacked a cup of candy, so he came to Zhu Xiaodi's house again. Zhu Xiaodi was very smart and lived in a house built with bricks. The wild wolf still called the door. Not only did the pig brother not open the door for him, but he also said that the wild wolf's grandmother was old and ugly. Grandma was insulted, and the wild wolf was naturally very angry. Just as she was about to break the pig's door, the police surrounded her.

After the wild wolf was arrested, the reporters knew that he had eaten two piglets, but thought the story of severe cold and sugar was not exciting, so they exaggerated and distorted the story, turning it into a house that blows down the piglet, and the wild wolf becomes a "bad guy, big wild wolf".

The wild wolf in the story looks polite in a suit and glasses; on the contrary, the pig's expression is not as kind as imagined. Combined with the self-report of the wild wolf in the story, it makes people feel that the wild wolf is really wronged.

In fact, it doesn’t matter which version of the story is really. These two versions are like two opposing views. When parents read with their children, they can use these two versions to train their children’s critical thinking and verify their doubts. Have a parent-child debate with your children. Both parties raise questions when choosing their opinions, then look for evidence and say what they think is correct.